Show...me...your print variations!

[steve B]

I forget which year, but there were baseball backs with non-sticker mork and mindy sticker fronts.

There were also 78 baseball backs inside bazooka boxes
and black hole card backs inside bazooka boxes.

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by steve B

I forget which year, but there were baseball backs with non-sticker mork and mindy sticker fronts.

They were also 1978.

[steve B]

Thanks Cliff.

I have one or two, but I was too lazy to go find them.

The 79front/78 backs were originally sold by a dealer I think from the Baltimore area, in strips. What I heard was that they knew where Topps printer dumped trash, and had a bit of a find one day being there at the same time as the truck that had Topps stuff.
I have a strip I ordered back then, not sure where it is but I know I didn't cut it. It got a bit squashed in shipping, put me off mailorder for a few years.

Topps must have had a ton of leftover 78back only sheets.

Steve B

[savedfrommyspokes]

Found this limited, but recurring print variant on the 69 455 Siebert card. Above the first "I" in Indians there is what appears to be a pen mark, but it is indeed a recurring mark. This is another variant that looks much more obvious in hand.

[ALR-bishop]

Larry---had not seen that one. I do have the one with a blue line to right of the bill of his cap, one with a broken spot in that same "I", and one with a reddish brown color between his legs. Isakur has the first two of those up on ebay now

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

Larry---had not seen that one. I do have the one with a blue line to right of the bill of his cap, one with a broken spot in that same "I", and one with a reddish brown color between his legs. Isakur has the first two of those up on ebay now

Different year, that one is the 1967 . Same photo, though.

[ALR-bishop]

My Bad

Even worse, in checking my set I have that one. I need a "normal" one

[savedfrommyspokes]

Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman

Different year, that one is the 1967 . Same photo, though.

I thought I was losing my mind looking at other 69s looking for these other variations, being a 67 explains why I was not finding them?!?!