![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Joe Doyle N. Y. Nat'l card was printed ONLY with the PIEDMONT 350 back. American Lithographic (ALC) caught their mistake very quickly on the Joe Doyle card's
caption (Doyle was a pitcher for the NY Highlanders), and removed the "Nat'L" lettering. The initial press runs on the T206 backs usually being PIEDMONT 350. Notwithstanding ALC's quick caption correction.....several Joe Doyle error cards were shipped to Factory #25 in Virginia. How many were inserted into PIEDMONT packs we will never know. To date, exactly 9 of these Joe Doyle error cards have been confirmed **. Furthermore, my research has revealed that 2 (perhaps a 3rd) of the 9 known Doyle N. Y. Nat'L cards have been discovered in original collections which have emanated from the greater Atlanta area. The Georgia connection with the Joe Doyle error card and the Elite 11 cards may be just a coincidence. Or, may be real as my original theory proposes here in Post #1. ![]() ![]() POP Report data (for whatever it's worth, as I'm sure there are some crossed-over cards in these tallies). Note the close comparison to the known Doyle error cards. Elite 11 ..............SGC + PSA......Ungraded (mine) Dahlen (Boston)........... 4 ................. 2 Ewing......................... 9 ................. 2 Ganley....................... 15 ................ 1 Tom Jones.................. 11 ................ 1 Karger........................ 11 ................ 1 Lindaman.................... 9 .................. 1 Lundgren (Cubs)......... 13 .................. 2 Mullin.......................... 1 .................. 4 Schaefer (Detroit)......... 7 .................. 1 Al Shaw...................... 10 ................. 1 Spencer....................... 4 .................. 0 ** Note....a number of "fake" Doyle error cards have surfaced since the late 1980's. Some of these were even graded. The most notorious one with a POLAR BEAR back. TED Z T206 Reference . Last edited by tedzan; 12-23-2017 at 08:45 AM. Reason: Correct typo. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ted, did you miss my reply and Pat's reply earlier?
It's cool to try and think outside the box and come up with theories, but this one is completely misguided and replies on false premises. I think it would be better if you made it clear these are just ideas you have when you post stuff like this. You write it as if it's fact, and people who are less knowledgeable about the set might read it and believe it's true because you have a reputation as a guy who knows T206s. There's no connection between Doyle and the Elite 11 because they are from different print groups. Doyle was never printed on the same sheet with any of the Elite 11 poses. The Elite 11 poses were never printed side-by-side. You're misunderstanding their connection. They are connected, but it's because their careers changed soon after T206 production began and they were pulled from production early in the Piedmont 350 print run. You actually mention in your post the specific reasons that each players was pulled from the set. So, you do understand it, you're just going one step too far by suggesting that they were printed next to each other on the same sheet. We know from Pat's research that they were not printed together. They were placed randomly on sheets just like every other pose. In order for all of the Elite 11 poses to be printed together, ALC would have had to sit down at the beginning of T206 production and said, "Alright, Dahlen is going to get released in October 1909, Ewing is going to get traded January 20th 1910, Ganley will get selected off waivers by Philadelphia on May 18th, 1909, Lindaman, Lundgren, and Shaw will be out of the Majors in a year... So, we should place these 11 poses next to each other for easy removal from the set in a year or so." In other words, they would have had to see into the future in order to place them side-by-side on a sheet. You saying that those 11 poses were next to each other on a sheet is the same thing as me saying all the Hall of Famers from the T206 set were side-by-side on a sheet. I'm using a connection that could only be made years later, and misapplying it. Here's a Piedmont 150 sheet that shows that Schaefer, Mullin and Lindaman were not next to each other. https://photos.imageevent.com/patric.../Sheet%203.jpg
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Luke
I replied to Pat's comment in Post #4. For starters....I will first ask you the same as I asked him...... " Do we really know if American Litho (ALC) printed 350-only subjects with 150/350 subjects on the same sheets when ALC started printing 350 backs on the 150 series cards ? " Do you have any proof that ALC did not ? ? Show it to me ! Because we certainly do know ALC in their 1st series printing of T215-1 cards (circa 1910) there is a mixture of 150/350, 350-only, and 350/460 series cards. Which confirms to us that in certain new series, ALC re-arranged their printing plates, and also added new plates. 2nd....You're assuming that ALC started their 350 press runs of 150 series cards using the same sheets that ALC used when they printed the 150 press runs. Well, let's see your proof of this ? 3rd....Look here, you don't have to tell me anything about the Elite 11 that I don't already know. Ten years ago on this forum, I presented my theory regarding the Elite 11 (when no one here was aware of the scarcity of these T206 subjects with PIEDMONT 350 and EPDG backs. But, now you write up in your blog just about everything I have for years presented on this forum....and, you don't even possess the common decency to acknowledge my research ! ! 4th.... And, quit the crap of trying to lecture me regarding the career status of 10 (of the 11) guys. The following is an excerpt of what I posted on Net54 some time ago...... Quote:
TED Z T206 Reference . |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
350 only subjects on sheets with 150/350 subjects but from what we do know about the printing it's unlikely that they did. A few reasons why it's unlikely that Doyle was printed on a sheet with the elite eleven..... For starters Doyle isn't a true 350 only subject. He was printed with an Apple green Sovereign 350 back so he was printed later in the 350 series which makes him a print group 3 subject. Doyle Sov 350.jpg There are no miscut front cards with a 150/350 subject and a 350 only or 350/460 subject. Of the 40+ confirmed two name cards both names are all either 150/350 or 350 only or in a couple of examples 350 only/super print. http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...=142480&page=5 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Pat This statement by T206resource is very misleading...... "For starters Doyle isn't a true 350 only subject. He was printed with an Apple green Sovereign 350 back so he was printed later in the 350 series which makes him a print group 3 subject." These 66 subjects were initially printed as 350-only cards when American Litho (ALC) started printing the 350 series cards. Subsequently, ALC chose these 66 subjects for the 350/460 series. During the SOVEREIGN 350 print runs, ALC identified these 66 guys with "apple green" backs. As we know, Joe Doyle's career ended before the 350/460 print runs (circa late 1910 > early 1911). Therefore, this subject is indeed a 350-only card. Which I believe was printed very early in the 350-series press runs. I base this on these 2 factors...... Richard Russell's Joe Doyle N. Y. Nat'L card must have been acquired early in 1910 (or late 1909). As, 96 % of the subjects in the 350-series part of his collection have PIEDMONT 350 backs. And, mostly this one....The corrected Joe Doyle card with an EPDG back is very rare. v.................................... Six super-prints ....................................v ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Furthermore, I will repeat....the T215-1 (RED CROSS) series....which was printed in the same timeline (circa 1910) as these T206's....comprises of a mixture of 150/350, 350-only, and 350/460 cards in their 1st series. Which absolutely confirms that in certain series, ALC re-arranged their printing plates from other print runs (and perhaps also added new plates). Your "plate scratch" project is an excellent analysis, and I commend you for your work. However as I see it, so far it only applies to PIEDMONT 150 sheets. Regarding print runs of subsequent series and the various other T206 brands, I think different things occurred (that remain to be analyzed). TED Z T206 Reference . |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ted, I don't know why you think I said ALC didn't re-arrange the sheets
as a matter of fact I've posted several times that I think the layouts and sheet sizes were changed through out the printing process but I don't believe that 150/350 subjects were on the same sheet as 350 only or 350/460 subjects or that Doyle was printed very early in the 350 printing. I don't know that much about the T215-1 cards but I do know they are scarce enough that it's hard to compare them with any regular T206 printing. Do you know for a fact that there were different series together on the same sheet? As far as I know a single Mathewson (White Cap) is the only confirmed 150/350 subject how do we know that there wasn't a sheet of 150/350's printed and they are scarce enough that no others have surfaced. Do you believe that the Forrest Green Sovereign was printed before the Apple Green and if you do why was Doyle printed with Apple green if he was printed early in the 350 printing? Last edited by Pat R; 12-24-2017 at 11:55 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Check out the Standard Catalogue, all 96 cards in the T215 set are listed. My research iidicates that possibly two 48-card print runs were done. The 1st series in 1910 and the 2nd series of 48 cards in 1911 > 1912. The Matty (white cap) was most likely included in the 1st series (with 350-only cards). It's interesting to see how up-to-date these cards are regarding trades. For example....Huggins (hands at mouth) is Cincinnati. And, Huggins (portrait) is St. Louis. Quote:
The "PIRATE" set mirrors the T215 set. Quote:
And, as I've stated before, ALC selected 66 subjects to be extended into the 350/460 series. Three of these 66 guys were not printed with 460-type backs since their careers ended in the Major Leagues (Joe Doyle, Simon Nicholls, Bob Rhoades). Why ALC printed the backs of these 66 subjects with a lighter ciolored Green ink is not really known. My guess is that ALC simply wanted to distinguish them from the sheets with the regular 350-only cards. Footnote.... Joe Doyle was a promising pitcher when he joined the Highlanders. And, ALC (being based in New York City) naturally favored the New York BB teams. And, I think ALC wanted to print more cards of him. TED Z T206 Reference . |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Joe Doyle NAT'L and it's 11 "cousins"....SURVEY | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 08-27-2019 03:00 PM |
T206 Doyle N.Y. +++ let's see your "Y" and "." | mybuddyinc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 06-18-2018 08:05 AM |
Adventures in Autographs "The Pittsburgh Kid" BILLY CONN Part II of II | JimStinson | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 12 | 07-14-2013 10:01 PM |
Adventures in Autographs "The Pittsburgh Kid" BILLY CONN Part I of II | JimStinson | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 6 | 07-13-2013 11:17 AM |
Evers, Tinker, Chance Reprints "Part TWO" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-08-2008 09:34 PM |