![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
looks like a bidder graciously bumped it from 5555 to 9150 before backing away. Either way the seller lost money.
__________________
Andrew Member since 2009 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is one of the biggest fears of openly displaying cards. UV is hell on cards. Do any of the cases used by the grading companies really protect cards from this problem?
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe they just hit the "reverse enhance" button on their scanner.
All joking aside that is one faded glory of a "7." Thank God for the plastic peepee measuring contest that makes this a 10K card.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That was actually me. I retracted my bid when I found out that the color was wrong from the heritage auction description. There was no mention of it on pwcc and they said how strong of a grade it was.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wow, a reasonable explanation that does not reek of a "conspiracy theory". How do those of you feel who jumped all over this?
Indeed, worthy of some attention at least...
__________________
Successful transactions on Net54 with balltrash, greenmonster66; Peter_Spaeth; robw1959; Stetson_1883; boxcar18; Blackie |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
-1 for failing to mention the fade Back to even
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I think it should have been mentioned, but I don't fault them for not mentioning it. After all, does something that obvious really even need to be mentioned? Anybody can see that it's faded. It's not like it's a hidden crease or something. We all saw it. But, hey, if it throws PWCC under the bus, lets go for it, right? |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sure it's obvious but in light of the glowing praise thrown at the card it bears mentioning IMO. You have yours, I have mine.
I would feel the same way regardless of the seller by the way. At the end of the day as long as the number on the flip is not faded, what does it matter, right? ![]()
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." Last edited by HRBAKER; 12-02-2017 at 07:09 AM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Regardless the description is a reflection of the seller. I'm surprised they didn't slap their pwcc certified looks great for the grade moniker on it as well? To say it is one of the nicest of its kind without mentioning its obvious negatives...is a poor reflection on the seller.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1922 Babe Ruth Hello Babe Pin Pinback PSA EX-MT 6 | stclaircards | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 11-01-2016 08:43 AM |
FS:R315 Babe Ruth,1920 W516 BABE RUTH, Mathewson 1927 York Walter Johnson,Hoyt ROOKIE | vintagehofrookies | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 23 | 03-20-2015 05:36 PM |
Babe Ruth Historians : Please post earliest known images of The Babe | DixieBaseball | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 01-30-2014 09:30 PM |
FS: 1927 - R94 - Babe Ruth - Babe Comes Home - strip card | pencil1974 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 09-06-2013 09:40 PM |
pre war... buble baths, slicing, dicing, and coloring | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-02-2006 06:55 PM |