![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As Lewis Carroll said, "Not the same thing a bit."
The NY Times, Washington Post, etc., are not using those sources to bolster an argument that they are putting forth. They are reporting things that are happening. (Not to mention that a single source is not enough. Nothing is reported unless corroborated.) Very different from "I'm right. And here's proof. A respected source (Sorry. I can't say his name.) agrees with me." Last edited by David Atkatz; 11-16-2017 at 10:08 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Personally I also think it is good. It just "looks right" overall. The "L" is a bit different but it is RUSHED AND on a small card signed sideways. Items shift.. people jerk away when they are moving fast/standing up... people get tired.
The fact that the "L" does not match 100 percent does not discount the rest of the autograph(parts). I think it it was forged or secretarial, the "L" would look different as well as the other parts. As a whole, I think it looks good. But I am just a photo guy ![]() ps: I was even thinking of bidding on this one
__________________
[I]"When you photograph people in colour you photograph their clothes. But when you photograph people in B&W, you photograph their souls." ~Ted Grant Www.weingartensvintage.com https://www.facebook.com/WeingartensVintage http://www.psacard.com/Articles/Arti...ben-weingarten ALWAYS BUYING BABE RUTH RED SOX TYPE 1 PHOTOGRAPHS--->To add to my collection |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If we can get back to the autograph.
If it's a rushed signature, why does it look so labored? I agree it looks like what most rushed signatures look like including the ones David showed, but it doesn't look nearly as smooth as the others. Personally, I don't like it. Like others have said, opinions are opinions. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't think it's labored at all. (Just my opinion, though.)
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A little tougher to tell with pencil, but I agree I don’t think it looks labored either
__________________
[I]"When you photograph people in colour you photograph their clothes. But when you photograph people in B&W, you photograph their souls." ~Ted Grant Www.weingartensvintage.com https://www.facebook.com/WeingartensVintage http://www.psacard.com/Articles/Arti...ben-weingarten ALWAYS BUYING BABE RUTH RED SOX TYPE 1 PHOTOGRAPHS--->To add to my collection |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
E220 Ruth, Honey Boy Ruth, Harrington Gehrig, WWG Gehrig SOLD | glchen | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 2 | 05-15-2014 08:20 AM |
Lou Gehrig Joe Dimaggio Red Rolfe Album Page PSA/DNA Finest Gehrig!! | Sean1125 | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 2 | 10-11-2013 12:02 PM |
Baseball card art/photo:gehrig 34 goudey or not gehrig 34 goudey.that is the question | Forever Young | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 31 | 12-20-2012 07:14 AM |
Slightly O/T: Did Lou Gehrig really have Lou Gehrig's Disease? | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-19-2010 11:37 AM |
Gehrig, Cobb - Price Reduced Rogers Peet and Gehrig- W-UNC Sale | BKasarda | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 06-14-2009 11:01 AM |