![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which card do you believe is the Mantle Rookie card? | |||
1951 Bowman |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
215 | 89.58% |
1952 Topps |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 10.42% |
Voters: 240. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That isn't what "if" means.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For those who care about the regional/national distinction, let me know if I'm misinterpreting you, but I believe your position is:
If the average collector could buy a pack of cards by traveling 8 miles to a grocery store, then what is in that pack of cards might be a rookie card. If the same collector had to drive 408 miles to buy the same pack of cards, then what is in the pack is no longer a rookie card. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you can buy a pack of cards from a set anywhere and get any of the cards in the set no matter where the pack was bought, that's a nationally distributed set. If you could only get certain cards based on where you lived, that's a regionally distributed set.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Okay, got it. And why do you want that to have a bearing on what you designate as a rookie, as opposed to just saying in some cases, "This player's rookie card is pretty scarce because it was only a regional issue."?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I separate them for myself because I want what I consider to be the premier card, and to me the premier card is the card that was included in the biggest set. This principle applies to many other things too, not just baseball cards. A brand name has appeal across the board in many aspects of life where you can get one version of something or the name brand version of it.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't feel the need to change your mind or feel as though I have anything to prove to you. This is a discussion about what people consider to be rookie cards. Why are you so hung up on what I think?
Just for the record though, I consider the E107 to be Cy's rookie. Last edited by packs; 11-08-2017 at 10:32 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When I started collecting around age 9, rookie card and first card would have been synonymous in my head. I’m wondering if its possible the reason for the distinction has something to do with not including too many rare or relatively rare first cards in registry sets. Red Grange is a good example from football cards - there are lots of cards that predate his '33 Goudey Sports Kings rookie.
Last edited by TanksAndSpartans; 11-08-2017 at 09:52 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1962 Topps FS: Mantle, Mantle AS, (2) Rookie Parades and more | autograf | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-01-2014 10:22 AM |
One determined bidder........ | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 06-07-2014 06:47 AM |
Mr. X ... was it ever determined who he/she/them were? | Howe’s Hunter | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-29-2012 11:13 AM |
'57 Topps Brooks Robinson Rookie, '58 Topps Ted Williams, '68 Topps Mickey Mantle | mcreel | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 10-24-2011 08:29 AM |
'57 Topps Brooks Robinson Rookie, '58 Topps Ted Williams, '68 Topps Mickey Mantle | mcreel | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 10-22-2011 08:06 PM |