 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-13-2017, 05:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
W575 shouldn't be W's as it gives them a bum rap that they are hand cut. Only trimmed ones are, in my experiences. I do like the catchall of the "W575" series with different ads on them, otherwise.
.....Personally, I would make them H-Unc....  , though technically this group would be "M"575-Unc.....
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-13-2017 at 05:09 PM. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1959, 1973 BB Partial Sets, '76 & 77 complete sets, 2016 Topps rare sets!! 11/29 End | wolf441 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 11-29-2016 08:31 AM |
| What if..Burdick had classified T206's with respect to their individual 15 T-brands ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 64 | 02-25-2010 11:09 AM |
| Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 07-23-2008 08:52 PM |
| Classified Ads | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-04-2002 04:07 PM |
| Classified Ads | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 04-26-2002 08:57 AM |
Hybrid Mode
