![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you! As I prepare my first two submissions, I was wondering that very thing. If I hope a card is a 9, but know it could come back a 8 or even lower should I value it to my belief or if I value it as a 7, will it affect my grade with them thinking I don't believe in the card?
Based on your answer, I'm thinking too damned much! Which sadly is normal for me. I had even tried to find answers on the exact process to try and find out if the graders even know what valuation you gave. I couldn't find anything. But what you said makes sense. I know they have someone check in your cards, inventory them and enter them into the system. Don't they give them #'s so the graders don't even know whose cards they are grading? I do have question about centering and the exact process. Does anyone know how they measure, what they use, etc? I've been using a rigid metal ruler with cork on the bottom and using mm and a spreadsheet to get the ratio. I've tried to guess in 1/4 mm increments if it wasn't exactly on the line. Am I on the right track? Anyone know that process? The reason I check the centering is because I may not submit a card if it doesn't qualify. for example, a 1985 McGwire Olympic card. In a PSA 10, it's selling for good money. In a 9, not so much. I don't want to submit one that is automatically a 9 before it even gets to the grading. Lastly, and maybe this deserves its own thread.... What are people's thoughts about choosing "no qualifier" and allowing them to do a straight grade? I have a few high end cards that to me are 8 or 9 quality, but the cut/centering is such by my measurements it could be no higher than a 7. It seems to me, that a really nice straight 7 would command more than an 8 or 9 (OC). I'm talking mostly 50's and 60's vintage and yes, max value is important to me as some of these may be sold. Thoughts? Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If it qualifies as a 7 without a qualifier, they won't give it 8(OC). They would probably give it a 9(OC) unless you request no qualifiers, presuming the card is mint otherwise. I would rather get a 9(OC) than a 6 if they determine the centering deserves a 6. I'd rather have the highest registry score on my cards, and figure that resale value will fall in line.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm glad someone posted this because I have been weighing on offering up special PSA pricing to the board, but I didn't know what kind of demand there would be or what service levels/pricing you guys would prefer.
I know there are people who don't care when their stuff gets back and then there are some who are just living and dying by every second their card isn't in their hands. I'd like some feedback on this so feel free to post further on here or PM me. I may end up starting my own thread on this as well. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I've extended special pricing for BGS/BVG to several members here recently with good success so I've been thinking about doing the same with PSA. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Chris |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
MY EBAY STORE; If you see something you Like PM me. If you bought off me and were happy let others know; if you bought off me and weren't satisfied for whatever reason let me know.. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The way I look at it, which could be off side thinking, is, if a card is such that you need a loupe to see defects, it should grade higher than cards that don't need a loupe. These cards, for example, which are fairly recently graded, it is easy to see the inconsistencies but they graded higher than Sleater?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Many have said, if you think your cards are 8's or 9's then they'll like come back 6's and 7's. I have never sent any in but I have seen grades all over the map so it's best to set your expectations on the low side so your not as disappointed. I noticed this card tonight, and although I know scans don't always tell the whole story, this one, like many others from PSA, left me again scratching my head? ![]() http://www.ebay.com/itm/1952-Topps-3...042?rmvSB=true
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Understood. I've tried like hell to temper my expectations and hope I am being overly critical in most cases. Most of my cards will fall in the 5-7 range I believe. The only way to learn is send them in and see what happens, but I do completely understand what you are saying.
Quote:
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC special | Taxman | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 14 | 03-20-2013 04:23 PM |
A Special Thanks | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 05-15-2011 09:30 AM |
VCP Special | BobbyVCP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-09-2010 03:48 PM |
Next SGC $5 special? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-31-2007 05:57 PM |
A special thanks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-21-2005 11:13 AM |