![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is the same card, and I'm amazed that someone resubmitted it.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
same
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe someone sent it in for a re-holder and SGC decided to give it a more deserving grade?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Given the positioning of the cancelled stamp and the amount of ink transferred from the rubber stamp to the card those are 100% the same card in my opinion.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am not an expert on the issue but possibly the "cancelled" designation in the original grade was in error and the card was sent back in to reflect the accurate grade based on the back stamp? The new holder does not show the "cancelled" designation.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Greg, I don't disagree with you that yours is a possible explanation. What makes it strange, though, is why someone who bought the card just a month ago would want to take it upon himself to seek a lower grade, and then on an expedited turnaround time no less, when he was thinking of consigning it and likely assuring himself of a lower sales price. The stamping is obvious, and would not deceive any buyer who was thinking of buying it, so I can't see him feeling there was some moral high road in having it downgraded. If anything, IMO someone unfamiliar with the card's history would wonder if there is slight paper loss, erasure or unseen creasing that led to the card's grade of fair.
Just all in all bizarre to me.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Todd,
Maybe SGC bought back the card or compensated the buyer and downgraded it? I think SGC might provide you with some basic info if you were to write or call them. But I agree that it does seem odd based on the timeline you have suggested. Greg |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1994 Upper Deck basketball card # 170 Isaiah Rider - Timberwolfs 4 card lot $1.50 | richardcards | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 1 | 05-09-2014 04:57 PM |
1911 t201 mecca double folder card and 1 cuban card (SOLD !!!!!!) | chris122868 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 7 | 08-29-2010 01:20 AM |
TAKING OFFERS -- 1 T card, 1 E card 1 Notebook card 1 Diamond Star plus extra!! | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 12-11-2008 10:09 AM |
For sale 1932 Zeenut Hollywood Vitt, Manager Card cool card | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-24-2008 11:44 AM |
Ruth-Gehrig card, near mint, in Gary Engel's Japanese card auction. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-28-2002 06:33 PM |