|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Is that Joey Jay card really worth that much money, or am I missing something? Joey Jay #124 (Blue lines around stats) $600 MT-9
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Irv,
The prices that were quoted to you were for the 62 US cards. The Jay card in the US set is framed in red. However there are blue lines in the stat box. Card is rare and there is a Koufax and a Clemente with the same anomaly. I can post pictures as I have all three. The Jay in the Canadian set is worth 8-10 dollars depending on condition. The Sugar Crisp card is usually in better shape than the Bran Flakes card. Mike |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Would love to see those pics if it's not too much trouble?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Irv,
Here are the three from the 62 US set. Mike |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks, Michael.
Those are some great looking cards!
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
irv, I would caution you against using PSA 9 prices for cards that are cut from boxes. Many have spider wrinkles from the scissors used to cut them, which would put them at a 3-4 range if they even deserve a number grade at all. The three just shown with red borders would all likely get PSA AUTH, not number grades.
PSA 9s of cereal box cards from the 60s are super rare examples and are priced accordingly by the registry set collectors. Many were probably cut in the past 10 years, not 50 years ago by the kids that originally collected them. Many also have glue stains on the back because of the box construction. For the American Post cereal cards from 1963, it looks like PSA considers the commons in PSA 5 to be worth $3 and in PSA 9 of $60. That's a 20:1 ratio of a 9 to an Excellent card.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I know now from the info I have received, that these cards are nothing like I had originally thought. Lots have those glue stains, among other issues, so no thoughts now about sending them in. I appreciate the info.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 Last edited by irv; 08-27-2017 at 07:25 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pretty neat discovery (for me) | irv | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 08-21-2017 07:00 PM |
| Amazing T206 discovery by Dean's Cards | Bliggity | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 12-28-2015 08:35 AM |
| Post your "Quote" about this neat card | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 02-25-2011 07:20 AM |
| neat (post)cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 93 | 02-20-2009 10:34 AM |
| Exciting New Discovery Of One Of The Earliest Known Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 09-24-2004 05:29 AM |