 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13
08-13-2017, 04:18 AM
|
||||
|
||||
The Jackie looks like it was graded many years ago by the serial number. Back then even with the print dot a 9 was not shocking and from the looks and Mike's description I would have probably expected a 9 from 1992-2007. And before people scream that the standards should not change I agree but all three have tightened up in one way or another over the years in my opinion.
Last edited by glynparson; 08-13-2017 at 04:18 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| And they are OFF..memory lane | 1952boyntoncollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-26-2015 02:04 PM |
| Thanks Memory Lane | Stonepony | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 12-17-2015 03:14 PM |
| Memory Lane - Anyone win anything?? | bobbyw8469 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-06-2011 10:39 PM |
| You would think...(Memory Lane) | mintacular | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-01-2011 11:15 AM |
| Will Memory Lane EVER end? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-16-2006 04:18 AM |
Threaded Mode