What are your card must haves?

brianp-beme · #1 08-12-2017, 07:46 PM

I like my cards well centered and with sharp corners, like my Diamond Stars Hornsby. Sometimes I am willing to accept minor defects like my Goudey Ruth.

But seriously, my lower condition collecting no-no has been damage or heavy crease through the player's face.

Brian

irv · #2 08-12-2017, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gawaintheknight

My approach is: is this a problem the card had when it came out of the pack? If so, I don't care so much. So gum stains, centering, print marks, etc., not usually a big deal. Creases, stains, writing, rips, etc., more of a problem.

I am mostly the same way, although lately, I try my best to pick up centered cards as much as possible.
I wasn't always this way, but from reading here, over and over again, about centered cards, I have now been converted.

I think paper loss should be ignored.

I read all the time on E-Bay, if it wasn't for the paper loss, or the creasing, or the writing, this card would be mint.

No sh*t, Sherlock.

deeg23 · #3 08-12-2017, 07:59 PM

1. Centering
2. Centering
3. Centering
4. Corners
5. Edges

The first thing I always look at is centering! It does depend on the issue, as centering is tough for some, but typically, I'm moving on if it isn't centered 😊

clydepepper · #4 08-12-2017, 08:25 PM

for graded cards: EX and above...with no qualifiers.

for raw cards: EX-MT

.

SMPEP · #5 08-12-2017, 10:22 PM

Now that Hornsby is a PSA 10!!!!

That's a great card (also loved the Lelivelt - very cool card!).

darwinbulldog · #6 08-14-2017, 08:47 AM

Really depends on the card. Some of what I collect is plentiful modern stuff, so for that I'll just try to find a raw one on eBay that looks NM+ and if there's anything noticeably off I'll pass. Some of what I collect is unique or very nearly so, so the condition is irrelevant. (Can't find a better example if there's only one example.) For the moderately tough pre-war cards - like, say, a Kotton, it's probably like this.

1. No heavy creases
2. No paper loss
3. Player's image uninterrupted by stains or print defects
4. Clean back
5. No "poor" corners or edges
6. Centering I guess

Rich Klein · #7 08-14-2017, 08:55 AM

I'm not kidding -- I love Hobby related sports cards -- this one I'll never get

A little context - she used to be the Beckett on-line editor and I really do collect hobby people related card -- and have one of my own

There is also a Mike Jaspersen (son of Bob) in the same Allen and Ginter set and I could use one of those as well

mechanicalman · #8 08-14-2017, 01:01 PM

I'm not sure if it's a small bit of OCD, but I crave symmetry in my life, and that translates to an obsession with centering when it comes to cards (almost to a fault, at times.) After centering, I seek color/clarity. I can live with "corner touches" as I believe a 100+ year old card should have corners that look more loved than my 89 Upper Decks. I have learned to be OK with small creases that don't diminish the overall appeal. Bad backs don't distract me at all if the fronts are beautiful.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
must haves paying huge sums	sflayank	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	3	05-11-2014 09:37 AM
As baseball-card sales drop, North Jersey card sellers look to the stars - See more a	mcap100176	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	0	03-24-2014 12:03 PM
Introduction and a question on which cards are "Must Haves"	Clark7781	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	23	02-16-2010 07:33 PM
TAKING OFFERS -- 1 T card, 1 E card 1 Notebook card 1 Diamond Star plus extra!!	Archive	Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T	1	12-11-2008 11:09 AM
For sale 1932 Zeenut Hollywood Vitt, Manager Card cool card	Archive	1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	09-24-2008 12:44 PM