 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
08-10-2017, 12:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I join you all in asserting the superiority of the SGC 96 Jackie. I just cannot fathom why PSA would award a card with such a large, ugly fish-eye a MINT 9. They're totally wrong. At the very least, the label should have their qualifier for a print spot. Without taking another gander, even if the PSA Jackie has perfect centering, perfect print registry, strong color, and no other print spots, when I look at that card, my eyes go to "fish-eye" sore. The SGC 96 looks regal and presents perfectly.
Anyone bidding on the PSA crumb bum is obviously buying the holder, 'cause when the time comes and they open up their "new prized card", the fish-eye is gonna start winking at them with all its might. Regret is a powerful emotion, and they're going to get quite a dose of buyer's remorse. ---Brian Powell 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| And they are OFF..memory lane | 1952boyntoncollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-26-2015 02:04 PM |
| Thanks Memory Lane | Stonepony | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 12-17-2015 03:14 PM |
| Memory Lane - Anyone win anything?? | bobbyw8469 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-06-2011 10:39 PM |
| You would think...(Memory Lane) | mintacular | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-01-2011 11:15 AM |
| Will Memory Lane EVER end? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-16-2006 04:18 AM |
Threaded Mode