 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8
07-18-2017, 05:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
So here's my take:
1) PSA forced a downgrade and should have paid off the OP with cash to cover the difference in values. 2) OP should NOT resubmit in holder for review. Either crack out or leave as is. 3) Card is awesome. "tampered" in the OP made me think the card was determined tampered (maybe an erasure, which would be a two-point drop from the four as instead of 4(MK)? 4) My weighted average if resubmitted *raw* is a 4.5
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA Review | cardsnstuff | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-24-2016 07:39 AM |
| Any luck with a PSA 'Review'? | Kzoo | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 07-24-2015 10:18 PM |
| 2014 In Review | Joe_G. | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-28-2014 07:32 AM |
| 55,56 topps raw review FS | zachclose21 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 06-05-2013 07:44 PM |
| PSA review question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-01-2007 11:28 PM |
Threaded Mode