![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
t206 cards do fall out of the parameters of 1 7/16 " by 2 5/8 " occasionally, but more probability correlates to trimming....psa graders are blind! they are just starting to understand the set, where as sgc has always been ahead of the curve......4 to 1 misgrades to sgc on average
![]() GET THEM SOME EYEGLASES! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
btw...not you to get glasses
![]() usually 1/16" deviation from standard parameters is acceptable....looks like a really short top border and a relatively standard bottom border from the scan....id gamble over 1/16 " short psa should measure the cards accurately! if it fell within the acceptable parameters, sgc would have graded that puppy even if factory cut short most t206 I see factory cut out of standard dimensions are oversized rather than factory cut short as the norm(not like it isn't possible tho ![]() Last edited by mrvster; 07-11-2017 at 11:12 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's amasing get it graded, take it out, get it regraded. Guys must like making the TPG companies rich and wasting your money. Basicly 3 grading companies out there control the whole thing and guys rely on the word as gospel. If you get it graded be happy and move on. To much time wasted and the TPG companies laughing all the way to the bank.
Last edited by keithsky; 07-11-2017 at 11:49 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
haha, I'm sure I could use them too, like when I can't find something and I complain to my wife and turns out it was right in front of my face
![]() but back on topic, my only points were that it SGC didn't find any evidence of trimming (otherwise they would've checked the "evidence of trimming" block), that its *possible* the card came short from the factory, and that the card measured short by an amount bigger than SGC was comfortable giving a grade. Neither TPG found evidence of trimming, but SGC covered their backside. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
funny you should mention that.....I thought of the same thing! without seeing the edges and measuring, I would bet its trimmed....was wondering why sgc didn't check trimmed?? or altered??? but covering their butt put that ???
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USPS strikes again | kmac32 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 10-16-2015 10:12 PM |
BCCG Strikes Again | Matt | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 59 | 11-26-2010 08:50 AM |
Bushing strikes again! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-27-2006 09:28 AM |
Toni Strikes Again | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-15-2003 11:54 AM |
2 strikes | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-15-2002 02:47 PM |