E95 Plank--PWCC auction

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Let's stick with SGC, it makes so much more sense -- 50 55 60 70 80 82 84 etc.

Failed attempt at sarcasm. SGC still lists the numeric 10 point grade on the flip (e.g. 55 = 4.5, 60 = 5, 70 = 5.5, etc) so what's the difference?

Don't you have another PWCC bash thread to start?

[Peter_Spaeth]

When I have one to start, David, you will see it. Now back to your gratuitous hostility...

PS A system with varying 10, 8 and 4 point gaps between full grades is odd to me, even if it's laid out on the flip.

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

When I have one to start, David, you will see it. Now back to your gratuitous hostility...

No hostility, Peter. I just didn't understand your ridiculous comment about SGC. Nobody is saying that SGC is better than PSA, so why even bring them up in the first place?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

No hostility, Peter. I just didn't understand your ridiculous comment about SGC. Nobody is saying that SGC is better than PSA, so why even bring them up in the first place?

Just my train of thought I guess. As I was reading about what seems to be confusion and complexity with PSA grading it occurred to me that SGC also had some quirks.

[Brent Huigens]

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We agree that this should have been graded a 3 MK, and regret we missed this in the listing. We reached out to the buyer and offered to accept a return. I will update this thread when we hear from the buyer on his/her decision.

Thank you,

Betsy Huigens
PWCC Auctions

[Jay Wolt]

This is very disappointing, as I pointed this issue out to the seller no fewer than 4 times, and they said they would "look into it."

Betsy The OP contacted you before the auction ended. Why didn't you look into it then?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Jay Wolt

Betsy The OP contacted you before the auction ended. Why didn't you look into it then?

"No fewer than 4 times" is what the OP said.