![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Personally, I think it would be quite interesting to examine it under a 16X loupe to see if the "A" is consistent with the card's other printed characteristics (the glass is half-full?).
Just sayin'. Best wishes, Larry |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I always thought this would have graded higher but whomever submitted it (before I got it) chose not to have the MK hence the 2.5. The little check mark on the back, near the bottom right side, is hard to miss?
![]() ![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 07-06-2017 at 04:45 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very nice card from my perspective, Leon. Congrats on it!
Highest regards, Larry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice card, Leon.
The big difference, Leon, is that I WOULD buy your card with a mark (and a LOWER grade than the aforementioned Plank card in the original post), if it were for sale, but I would not buy the altered Plank that received a higher grade. Just sayin'... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is still some confusion about requesting no qualifiers. Please read post #29. It is a screen shot from PSAs website, "there are certain qualifiers that PSA will not remove such as MK."
It's right there in black and white. You cannot request no qualifiers when the card has a mark. If you see a card that has a mark but has no MK qualifier, PSA simply overlooked the mark. Nice card, Leon. PSA missed the check mark. As for the card itself, it has several minor creases to warrant the grade of 2.5. The proper grade would have been PSA 2.5 MK |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There are no half grades with qualifiers. Either one or the other. Here is the marked card that PSA just gave a straight 5.
![]() 1968 Topps - [Base] #66.1 - Casey Cox (Yellow Team Name) [SGC*20] Courtesy of COMC.com As you can see, it has red scribble marker on the jersey and "blood tears" in both eyes. I was floored when it popped as an unqualified card. I think their website is wrong, and they do downgrade cards to remove MK qualifiers.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 07-06-2017 at 08:47 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kind of like there's no half grades with qualifiers, huh?
Lots of misinformation in this thread. I blame it all in PWCC ![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There are no creases or wrinkles that I can see under magnification. Try another answer please. Personally I think whomever submitted it got it done without the MK and a lower grade because of it. I know what their site says...
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
A PSA 2.5 is accurate given the creases. I'm not knocking the card. I would love to own it. But it is graded accurately. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PWCC Plank currently on eBay PSA 2 | Topps206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 61 | 09-10-2016 03:18 PM |
Recent PWCC Auction | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-08-2016 12:50 PM |
PWCC Auction Yet Again | Yoda | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 101 | 07-20-2016 11:02 AM |
PWCC Auction | Yoda | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 98 | 02-13-2016 05:12 PM |
Auction house Plank vs Ebay Plank PSA 5 | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 01-04-2013 12:35 AM |