Clean Sweep Auction: 1947 Dodgers "World Series" Ring

[puckpaul]

well, to be fair, the Heritage description later calls it a "Championship ring". ok, i would consider a true "Championship ring" without the "NL" qualifier to be the world series winner. secondly, Clean Sweep says it's a world series ring and immediately says they lost in the next sentence. Heritage makes no mention of losing! I think what the ring is is obvious in Clean Sweep, and title is very clear its an NL Championship ring, which is the same thing as a world series ring when you lose the world series.

splitting hairs here...

[calvindog]

Originally Posted by puckpaul

well, to be fair, the Heritage description later calls it a "Championship ring". ok, i would consider a true "Championship ring" without the "NL" qualifier to be the world series winner. secondly, Clean Sweep says it's a world series ring and immediately says they lost in the next sentence. Heritage makes no mention of losing! I think what the ring is is obvious in Clean Sweep, and title is very clear its an NL Championship ring, which is the same thing as a world series ring when you lose the world series.

splitting hairs here...

The original description did not note that Brooklyn lost the WS. And the title originally said World Series ring: "1947 Brooklyn Dodger original World Series ring," nowhere did it say "NL championship ring" or any kind of championship ring: just "World Series ring." Heritage described it as a "1947 Brooklyn Dodgers National League Championship Ring."