 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
05-03-2017, 05:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
FWIW, all of them have really old flips (when most people think they were more lenient on vintage). However, calling the Chance a "borderline bump card" is stretching it, as I would be shocked to get a 4 if I submitted that one.
However, if that is due to the scan, they need to rescan that card. They're not doing it any favors. The staining on the first card would require the ST designator now. Did all the qualifiers exist at the beginning of PSA?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| And they are OFF..memory lane | 1952boyntoncollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-26-2015 02:04 PM |
| Thanks Memory Lane | Stonepony | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 12-17-2015 03:14 PM |
| Memory lane Auction question | AddieJoss | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-16-2015 06:44 PM |
| Memory Lane | margoaepi | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 01-10-2012 01:13 PM |
| Memory Lane | YankeeCollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 08-22-2011 02:28 PM |
Hybrid Mode
