 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-28-2017, 07:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I have a complete 1-108 set. I did not make a difference between '34 vs '35.
I agree with the previous comment that scarcity doesn't always relate to value. There are only a handful of people completing the master set, with all year variations, which would increase demand. Since the set does not have Ruth or Gehrig it does not have the same popularity as Goudey but I still think it is a great set with the art deco design and high % of HOF's. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What Larry Doyle Is Trying To Tell Us About T206 Relative Scarcity | T206Collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 12-24-2011 05:49 AM |
| T206 Question: Relative Scarcity of HOFers and SLers | Luke | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-10-2010 07:02 PM |
| T206 -- Relative Scarcity or What Autographs Can Tell You | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-27-2009 06:27 AM |
| E92s - Relative scarcity of backs? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-16-2007 10:36 AM |
| Broadleaf 460 vs Wagner T-206s (relative scarcity) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 06-18-2006 08:00 PM |
Hybrid Mode
