Brent Huigens - PWCC. Do you really want to keep this game up? I'm ready boss.

[Brent Huigens]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I thought PSA returned the card to PWCC during the auction after it was sent in for expedited review and despite having been informed about the problem, said it stood by the grade. Or so you said before.

"We did indeed engage PSA to verify the accuracy of their assessment on this 1936 WWG DiMaggio. As we strongly believed, the card is graded accurately and this was re-confirmed by PSA prior the auction sale."

The stories are not consistent IMO.

Peter, yes indeed they did. Just last week they decided to remove the item from the registry. It appears that they reconsidered the grade post sale. In light of this, the buyer has been given the opportunity to return the card.

Betsy

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Brent Huigens

Peter, yes indeed they did. Just last week they decided to remove the item from the registry. It appears that they reconsidered the grade post sale. In light of this, the buyer has been given the opportunity to return the card.

Betsy

They removed the card without it in hand? That makes no sense to me. And why did this even come up again as an issue, if they vetted the card during the auction? And why were they deliberating with you, as opposed to internally? If I were PSA I wouldn't care what you thought frankly, and besides they already knew your opinion.

[PhillipAbbott79]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

They removed the card without it in hand? That makes no sense to me. And why did this even come up again as an issue, if they vetted the card during the auction? And why were they deliberating with you, as opposed to internally? If I were PSA I wouldn't care what you thought frankly, and besides they already knew your opinion.

I will attest to the fact that PSA requires the item back, so they can prosecute and press charges, when they know who is responsible. This is clearly against their policies when dealing with others.

I concur, this is making zero sense at all.

[irv]

LOL. This just gets better by the minute!

[TobaccoKing4]

[CrackaJackKid]

PWCC...you guys are doing more harm than help to the hobby. All the shenanigans when this is just a hobby to so many people. So much manipulation,fraud and decievement I really hope in 10 years your a thing of the past. But people will say, "oh but PWCC gets some of the nicest looking cards from consignors, probably cause you guys have every card doctor/soaker on speed dial. I have not nor will I ever purchase a card from PWCC. I'm done...WHEW!!!..I feel better.

[ZiggerZagger]

Well now I'm eagerly glued to the PSA POP Report on the T206 Wagner -- it'll probably only be a matter of hours before the butchered McNall-Gretzky Wagner is finally pulled!!

It's a brave new world!

Originally Posted by Brent Huigens

Peter, yes indeed they did. Just last week they decided to remove the item from the registry. It appears that they reconsidered the grade post sale. In light of this, the buyer has been given the opportunity to return the card.

Betsy

[irv]

Originally Posted by ziggerzagger

well now i'm eagerly glued to the psa pop report on the t206 wagner -- it'll probably only be a matter of hours before the butchered mcnall-gretzky wagner is finally pulled!!

it's a brave new world! :d:d:d

lmao! :d

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by ZiggerZagger

Well now I'm eagerly glued to the PSA POP Report on the T206 Wagner -- it'll probably only be a matter of hours before the butchered McNall-Gretzky Wagner is finally pulled!!

It's a brave new world!

Good point, and that card unlike the WWG DiMaggio actually has an admission from the culprit that it was indeed hand cut from a sheet.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

Good point, and that card unlike the WWG DiMaggio actually has an admission from the culprit that it was indeed hand cut from a sheet.

Brent who bought the card in a 4 acknowledged the work was done to turn it into a 7.

[PhillipAbbott79]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Brent who bought the card in a 4 acknowledged the work was done to turn it into a 7.

He just hasn't admitted it was him, unless I am mistaken.

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by PhillipAbbott79

He just hasn't admitted it was him, unless I am mistaken.

I also must have missed the post where he said he had the work done.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by PhillipAbbott79

He just hasn't admitted it was him, unless I am mistaken.

He bought it as a 4, and HE consigned it as a 7. And he obviously knew what had been done as he characterized it to Sean as minor minor. Ya think he didn't have it done?

[PhillipAbbott79]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

He bought it as a 4, and HE sold it as a 7. Ya think he didn't have it done?

That can certainly be implied, but what you don't know is if he also sold it as a 4, before selling it again as a 7.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by PhillipAbbott79

He just hasn't admitted it was him, unless I am mistaken.

Welcome to spin planet.