![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Z |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I used cheese boxes that I got from the local Butcher in the early and mid 1970's
No rubber bands on my cards Last edited by rgpete; 04-22-2017 at 12:28 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My cards were also kept in numerical order by series with a rubber band wrapped around them. However, once I got the checklist card, that always went on top.
Kept them in a shoebox. At sometime in the middle of the 7th series, grouped them by team with the team card on top, of course with a rubber band around them. So, my checklist cards and team cards were the most damaged. Still have them all today and they are priceless! My checklists I marked as an 8 to 14 year old are in a binder right next to their better condition cousins that were purchased years later. Mike |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting question; there may be a generational factor involved because kids in the early '50's also had to deal with the conundrum of different sized cards from the big two manufacturers. In the spring of '52, I saw many stacks of cards held together by rubber bands simply because the larger Topps cards allowed the smaller Bowman cards to slip out and away more easily, and as a result, kids had to use bands to keep them together - of course, many kids simply resorted to taking a pair of scissors to the Topps product - yikes - to trim it down to Bowman size. Strangely, I haven't noticed many of those butchered Topps cards showing up in the market in later years. I suppose most dealers simply tossed them out in the decades after the '50's.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But, in regard to the numbering issue, the practice of using a major star player on the first card in each set definitely affected a kid's tendency toward banding the stack. I imagine that many '52 Topps Pafko cards suffered banding damage simply because Andy was a common player, not deserving of the respect shown to cards of guys like Berra, Robinson, Rizzuto, Williams, et al. that were more likely to occupy the top position. Still remember rubber-banding my stack of '53 Bowman cards and not worrying about damaging that other Williams, though. Did George Moll really think that Davey was a budding superstar?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Out of all of my friends in the neighborhood and all of the kids in the Card clubs in school I was the only kid who did not use rubber bands to help keep my cards organized. I always kept my cards in numeric order but the majority of kids kept theirs in order by team. But every card show in the eighties had their cads in numeric order with most in rubber bands? But I have always felt first and last card was more of a myth as far as hard to find in top condition?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In the late 70's-early 80s I kept them in shoe boxes with rubber bands. Sorted by team but in no particular order. All my other non-sports cards were usually kept in paper grocery bags. When I got back into cards briefly in 1985 they all made it into proper card boxes, and then my vintage cards were stolen in 1995 in a move or where I was living at the time. The only ones I miss are my 72 football cards, where I had a bunch of them, including Staubach's rookie card.
__________________
98.5% of 1969-1980 Topps Sets Completed 8,401 base cards, 8,278 acquired, 123 to go ![]() 1971-1980 Complete |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When I was a kid in the early 80s I did not want to keep my cards in a shoe box. My father suggested a computer punch card box and brought one home from work. I kept my cards sorted by team in a single computer punch card box at first. From there, I added a second box, so the NL and AL had their own box. Then each division had it's own box and I was up to four. At one point, my father had brought home about 20 of these boxes which I had filled by the mid 80s, but now by year and number order. If I remember correctly, I stored the cards in two rows from the front to back. Each box could hold 1000+ cards....for me these were a precursor to the monster boxes.
Here is an example: |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Organized by teams in rubber bands inside any box close to the right size, but preferred writing on the back, like this......
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I used to buy collections of cards from the 1960s and 1970s and they were almost always organized by team with rubber bands around each team. I don't think I ever bought a collection where the cards were organized by number.
I think the #1 cards are beat up because they were in the first series and first series cards were played with all summer whereas the higher series are usually less beat up because they were bought at the end of the season. I have bought some complete sets of cigarette cards from England (usually 50-card sets) and often they put the #1 card behind the #2 card and have the set wrapped in a paper strip. Those small sets are always saved in numerical order and the #1 cards do get more wear in that type of set. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The card that got away twice...is it gone for good? & Share your cardhunting stories! | njdunkin1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 02-04-2017 04:51 PM |
Childhood or adulthood rip off stories | zljones | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 44 | 06-22-2012 08:23 AM |
Tobacco Card Stories | John V | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-30-2009 06:20 PM |
Request for Card Stories | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-22-2004 10:17 AM |
Request for card stories | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-19-2004 04:55 PM |