REA lot featuring e90-1 Joe JAckson

[JustinD]

Originally Posted by Vintageismygame

I think the lower left corner is what caused it to get the "A" grade.

Matt

Good eye.

You're right, it does look bleached or erased.

[Bpm0014]

Does the top border looked trimmed? Or no?

[pawpawdiv9]

Great info guys, that's the card I had planned to bid on. Thanks!

[murphy8276]

They have added an addendum that it is likely trimmed.

Addendum (4/5/17, 10:40 AM): SGC does not keep records regarding the reason a card grades the way it does, but further examination of this card after several bidder inquiries reveals that a very slight trim may also have contributed to the Authentic designation though we cannot be sure.

[ullmandds]

ok...will WAJO be next???? a little more sensitive an "alteration" over there!!

[BobC]

Originally Posted by murphy8276

They have added an addendum that it is likely trimmed.

Addendum (4/5/17, 10:40 AM): SGC does not keep records regarding the reason a card grades the way it does, but further examination of this card after several bidder inquiries reveals that a very slight trim may also have contributed to the Authentic designation though we cannot be sure.

The fact that they don't keep a record of why a card grades the way it does is extremely interesting. Anyone know if this is just them or is it the same across the board with other TPGs?