![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I always found it boring, or annoying, when I pulled a checklist out of a pack as a kid. My opinion of them hasn't changed much since then.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree. I could never get myself to buy the 1963 Fleer checklist to complete the set because who wants to pay big money for a stupid checklist!
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is the card that comes to mind immediately for me.
__________________
Main Collection: http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=858 Diamond Stars HOFers: http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=862 The Amazin' Mets: http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=863 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I always imagine the disappointed Cold War kids ripping open packs of 1956 cards hoping for Jackie Robinson or Ted Williams and instead pulling a flannel-suited league president.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I know what you mean Andy. But this one for me is not that bad, I think because it's Stengel who always looked like the definition of a "weathered old man" and that makes it interesting to me. That 1972 card of the minor league trophies is painful to look at!
__________________
Working on the 1957 Topps set. Last edited by 7nohitter; 03-12-2017 at 10:42 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
While kind of boring, the Stengel really comes to mind because it had so much potential to be the first classic Mets card, but really disappoints with its logo-less, drab design.
__________________
Main Collection: http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=858 Diamond Stars HOFers: http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=862 The Amazin' Mets: http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=863 Last edited by ajquigs; 03-12-2017 at 08:49 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've always considered the 66 Keane the worst Topps card ever made.
Last edited by toppcat; 03-12-2017 at 05:34 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think that in 1966 Keane would be disappointing to find in your pack , much like most manager cards and checklists. Most of us , understandably , want ball players :roll eyes
You can keep the coaches, trophies and for heavens sake the umpires out of the sets!! Topps really showed a lack of creativity, design or appreciation of what a great opportunity they had in the 60's. They just look lazy. Hatless portraits, repeated poses year after year, dull pictures , plain designs...ugly airbrushed pictures. Sometimes I wonder why I collected them! I have that ugly Keane card in my binder but I don't think I have looked at it since I slid the card into the plastic sheet... I like the cards in the 70's much better (and the 50's) as a rule. i may be biased since the 70's I was pulling cards out of the packs...and somehow despite the dumb trophies, 1972 is my favorite set of all. Give me the psycho set all day! (damn high numbers!)
__________________
Thanks! Brian L Familytoad Ridgefield, WA Hall of Fame collector. Prewar Set collector. Topps Era collector. 1971 Topps Football collector. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ugliest and boring pre war issues | zljones | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 01-15-2012 11:01 AM |
1911 t201 mecca double folder card and 1 cuban card (SOLD !!!!!!) | chris122868 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 7 | 08-29-2010 01:20 AM |
Is ebay getting boring? | sgbernard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-15-2009 03:36 PM |
TAKING OFFERS -- 1 T card, 1 E card 1 Notebook card 1 Diamond Star plus extra!! | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 12-11-2008 10:09 AM |
another request (sorry if I'm boring everyone) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-16-2002 10:28 AM |