|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Paul I also respect your opinion, but the problem is he said he would have paid him back, had he been respected better. That is poor ethically right there. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I realize I'm replying when I said I wouldn't, but I think a few things need to be clarified.
First, Brent fails to mention that the Faber 33 Goudey came with a JSA auction house LOA, which I mailed him at the time of the trade. Second, Brent messaged me on December 23, 2014 and informed me that someone had told him the Faber W517 was wife signed. Everyone has now seen my response, and I did offer to replace the card or send some cash his way if he wasn't comfortable with the Faber. Brent responded that same day and stated "I love the card and I have no issues with it. I recall we've talked about this card before. I totally trust you and have no problem what so ever. I just love the card, will go nicely with my Rousch." Brent emailed again on December 30, 2014, to tell me he received the cards. He wrote, "Got the cards Saturday, just amazing! So happy with them, thank you!" I would have gladly reworked the deal at that point if Brent was uncomfortable with the Faber, but he clearly declined that offer. I never offered any type of guarantee that the card would pass authentication, and Brent never requested such a guarantee. Brent and I have made dozens of deals in the past, and I have to assume the rest of the cards he obtained from me passed authentication since they aren't referenced in this thread. If Brent had emailed explaining the situation and requesting that we work something out, I would have been much more willing to help resolve the situation. Brent may say his email wasn't demanding, but emailing out of the blue over two years later and stating "how should we go about refunding and returning?" sounds pretty demanding to me. I hope this clarified my position a bit. I agree that I shouldn't have stated that I would have given him a refund had he been less demanding, as that may not be a true statement. I can say that I would have at least given it more consideration at that point. I suppose one good thing to come from this is that I know never to deal with Brent again. I'm sure he won't voice any objection to that. Jason |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting little factoid
I bought an expensive card privately and the seller said " i dont know if its real, let me know what psa says" The card fails psa Seller didnt specifically offer a guarantee, although he offered it to me as an " autographed card" when it was not.It was now defaced, and worth less than an unsigned card. My counsel lost in court, since he had said "he didnt know"
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors Last edited by Republicaninmass; 03-11-2017 at 04:13 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Jason May Collection | Jasonxmay | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 7 | 11-14-2015 07:29 AM |
| Jason Duncan | 823dek | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 03-09-2010 10:50 PM |
| Jason L ~ Please Email Me~ | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-29-2009 12:30 PM |
| Who is Jason (homeschool_tribe@yahoo.com)??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-11-2008 08:24 PM |
| Jason Duncan | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-07-2004 10:29 AM |