![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's sounds very plausible, but the paper stuck to it is much thinner than the typical card stock and I would have thought that there would have been part of the front of the previous card showing somewhere, but there's no indications that the second piece stick to it had any color on it's reverse. Does that make sense? Unless you're saying that the the original card was practically split in half and this card picked up that other half. Thanks
Last edited by Blitzu; 03-05-2017 at 02:32 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just part of the back of the first card stayed on the scrapbook. The other card may be floating around somewhere with most of the back torn off.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is impossible. The back would be on backwards. My guess would be that someone attempted to repair the card...maybe??? That or someone found out it was re-backed and attempted to remove the bogus back and wasn't able to get it all off.
Last edited by PhillipAbbott79; 03-05-2017 at 05:01 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought the same thing perhaps with the rebacking theory but why would they choose the same piedmont back and not something else, especially when the original back appears to be undamaged.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As for the scrap book thing, I still don't see how the additional piece of paper back went unaltered if it was in fact glued to a book? There should be some type of evidence of glueing right?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What back is on the McCormick?
Last edited by bnorth; 03-05-2017 at 05:30 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Please explain how the back would be on backwards in my example. And feel free to actually read what I wrote if you want to.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here are a couple before and after scans. You can see that the specs of paper were aligned the same way as the back, which makes perfect sense since the first card (the Piedmont 350 in your instance) was pasted into the scrapbook in exactly the same way as the card above it (the Meyers).
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Meyers is a 460 only subject, by the looks of the card it looks like it's holding the card together. The Meyers is one of my favorite pre-war cards. As for price I would say $10 each.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Card doctors should not drink in the operating room.
![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gotcha. My brain interpreted what you wrote wrong.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
On Ebay: T206 Blackburne Old Mill, T206 Schulte back view, T206 Doolin/Doolan, T207 Street | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-04-2007 09:07 AM |