![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which Set? | |||
R330 Double Play |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 18.75% |
R312 Pastels |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
20 | 41.67% |
Bob Meusel Master Set |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | 22.92% |
Other (Not the Monster) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 16.67% |
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would go for the R312s — they're one of the most attractive sets of the 1930s, and they feature a nice mix of players, including some fantastic group shots (Wagner/Vaughn, Grove/Mack, etc.). Completing a set seems within reach. A Double Play set also seems like a reasonable goal, but it's almost all sepia portraits — I'd just as soon buy an old baseball guide for a fraction of the price and get pretty much the same thing. I agree a Bob Meusel collection sounds interesting, but I'd pick a player from the 1910 era or the 1930s instead because the cards are so much nicer. The same photograph is often used over and over on '20s cards, and when color is used, the artwork is mediocre at best. "Long Bob" did get a nice Exhibit card, though ...
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1941 Double Play NM & 1939 Play Ball Sample Card SOLD | quinnsryche | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-13-2017 02:53 PM |
F/S - 1941 Double Play ( R330) | hangman62 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 6 | 07-20-2013 08:38 PM |
(3) R312 pastels for sale | autograf | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-21-2012 08:19 AM |
(3) R312 Pastels for sale | autograf | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-20-2012 09:28 PM |
1940 Play Ball and 1941 Double Play Ending Tonight | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 04-10-2007 08:18 PM |