52 Mantle Vs T206 Cobb

[packs]

Is the Cobb Green really much harder to find though? It is available any time you wish to buy it from my experience. I don't think the same is true of the Mantle and each time the Mantle comes up for auction it's always a featured lot.

I'd buy the nicest SGC/PSA 2 Mantle I could find and then spend the rest on the nicest Green Cobb I could find (SGC/PSA 3-4). That's if it had to be between just those two cards

[sterlingfox]

Originally Posted by packs

Is the Cobb Green really much harder to find though? It is available any time you wish to buy it from my experience. I don't think the same is true of the Mantle and each time the Mantle comes up for auction it's always a featured lot.

There are about 10x as many 52T Mantles PSA graded 3 vs PSA 6 Green Cobbs.

[packs]

Doesn't it say something about the strength of the cards when one is worth the same as the other in twice the grade?

[PhillipAbbott79]

If the supply and demand ratios are different they could appreciate at different rates. Currently the Cobb is undergoing a ridiculous boom. That doesn't mean in 10 years it will be worth what its max appreciation was along the way. As mentioned in the poll, which is going to be worth at that point in time and why do you think that.

[bn2cardz]

Originally Posted by packs

Is the Cobb Green really much harder to find though? It is available any time you wish to buy it from my experience. I don't think the same is true of the Mantle and each time the Mantle comes up for auction it's always a featured lot.

On ebay there are currently 34 52 Topps Mantles and 8 T206 green Cobbs (only counted graded copies to assure legitimacy).

Between just those two cards I would take the Cobb. As mentioned Mantle (more specifically the 52 Topps Mantle) is over-hyped by good publicity. Three points were used in this publicity that are all myths.
1) He was the best player - Mays can be argued to be better, even if you don't agree the fact that the argument can be made shows they are at least comparable
2) It is his rookie - It isn't. That would be 1951 Bowman. Even if you argue it is his "Topps Rookie" then explain why the 1958 Topps Musial isn't described as such? Even though he too would be considered a better player by people.
3) It is a high number in a popular set - It is a high number, but there is evidence that it was double printed which reverses the "high number" scarcity concept.

At the end of the day it is TOPPS first iconic card. Since they are still in business and the only authorized distributor of Topps cards they keep pushing this card through reprints and other advertising. If MLB does what NBA and NFL did and ever change to Panini (Topps contract is up in 2020) it is possible they will lose this persuasive stature.

Since Cobb should all ready be smoothed out on prices his cards will continue at the same pace all other cards will within the t206 set. I believe it is the safer buy. If you are the riskier buyer Mantle could have the more upside, but you don't want to be the one left holding the bag in the end.

[mickey7mantle7]

Does a vote count towards my post count?

[packs]

I see some people's point on the Mantle as it relates to boomers but I don't see how an even older card of an even older player would surpass a more recent one, if boomer die off is what you're saying will drop the Mantle card's price.

[bn2cardz]

Originally Posted by packs

I see some people's point on the Mantle as it relates to boomers but I don't see how an even older card of an even older player would surpass a more recent one, if boomer die off is what you're saying will drop the Mantle card's price.

It is that there isn't anyone elevating Cobb's prices based on nostalgia, so his prices will be determined by other things (ie interest in t206). If Mantle's prices are elevated by nostalgia then when that dissipates the prices will adjust.

[packs]

That makes sense. Well I hope everyone is right about the Cobb because I don't have the Mantle.

[CW]

Mickey Mantle.