![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Noone said disclosing something like soaking is not value changing. There are many things on many listings that if disclosed would lower the value of the card. People sell their house and dont disclose lots of things that we all know could change the value, (after all if its not a big deal, why not disclose it) back to the hobby standard argument....wrinkles/crease/paper loss are disclosed, soaking is not.. partly because tough to prove knowledge on the seller that it was soaked versus having a card in hand and seeing paper loss etc. The 'why not disclose if not a big deal' argument means you need to list EVERYTHING, because as we know..just little little things can talk you out of wanting a card. That spec that we thought is on the holder, well its actually on the card, how come they didnt tell us that? The card has a smoke smell, ..why didnt they tell us that. card is soaked....etc etc.. Many things can impact a final sale, but its standard not to disclose everything in a sale of a card...just like houses.. Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 03-02-2017 at 10:01 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Frequently I will take my shirt tail and rub the wax off of a post-war card. Most of the time it comes off clean if the wax was on the front of the card. Sometimes it does not.
Soo, is this considered 'doctoring' the card? To me, if you are taking away something that is not supposed to be on the card in the first place, I find it hard to call it a doctored card. With that logic though, I guess pressing out a wrinkle (never tried that) would also not count. Thoughts?
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I think wrinkles will come back so they should be disclosed. Fine me one current auction listing on any card graded higher than authentic where its disclosed that the card was soaked with water. I not sure there are actually any listings authentic or not. Apparently its not a big deal since its never disclosed. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm good with that, no problem. Then again, I don't deal in high $$ cards where 10's of thousands of dollars are riding on something like that. Don't know what my answer would be if I did.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Baseball Trophy - UPDATED 6/4/17 To clean or not to clean | ruth-gehrig | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 25 | 06-05-2017 07:59 PM |
To clean or not to clean? Friendly debate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 10-26-2016 02:38 PM |
Strip Cards, To Clean or Not to Clean? | Flyingace | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-16-2016 06:48 PM |
civil war collapsible drink cup. clean or don't clean | khkco4bls | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 18 | 03-22-2014 08:34 AM |
Chris davis- clean or not clean, that is the question. | Forever Young | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 23 | 07-16-2013 08:30 AM |