Anyone Else Know this Answer?

[glynparson]

but for like the 1000th time, like it or not a rough cut is not considered a flaw. You can scream about it all you want the grading companies do not see it that way, and for the record neither do i. a rough cut is actually often considered a plus as proof it was not trimmed or sheet cut.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by glynparson

but for like the 1000th time, like it or not a rough cut is not considered a flaw. You can scream about it all you want the grading companies do not see it that way, and for the record neither do i. a rough cut is actually often considered a plus as proof it was not trimmed or sheet cut.

I only object when the cut extends into the corners and they are not square, at that point I think it's an appropriate deduction. A 9 with a 30 degree angled corner just seems wrong.

[Leon]

Agreed. I like the rough cut on some cards too. They look original... Some W501s come to mind...

Originally Posted by glynparson

but for like the 1000th time, like it or not a rough cut is not considered a flaw. You can scream about it all you want the grading companies do not see it that way, and for the record neither do i. a rough cut is actually often considered a plus as proof it was not trimmed or sheet cut.

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by glynparson

but for like the 1000th time, like it or not a rough cut is not considered a flaw. You can scream about it all you want the grading companies do not see it that way, and for the record neither do i. a rough cut is actually often considered a plus as proof it was not trimmed or sheet cut.

I completely disagree. It's a factory flaw, I doubt they intended for their cut to leave jagged edges just like they didn't want off center cards, and they didn't want printing flaws. It's a flaw, a very common flaw, but still a flaw. No card with a rough cut should ever get a 10. 10's should be reserved for perfect cards.