SGC, way to keep it consistent!

glynparson · #1 02-15-2017, 11:13 PM

Is not nor should it be the same as eye appeal. People need to grasp this concept. And indeed buy the card not the holder. This leads to prices not being based solely on the number on the holder which to me is a good thing. The fact is the hobby has decided not all flaws are created equal and these standards have been established over a long period of time.

Leon · #2 02-16-2017, 07:34 AM

All very true. We see this over and over and it is the way it is. It is probably the correct way if really debated. Unless you are playing registry tic tac toe then the grade should be secondary to the card.

Quote:

Originally Posted by glynparson

Is not nor should it be the same as eye appeal. People need to grasp this concept. And indeed buy the card not the holder. This leads to prices not being based solely on the number on the holder which to me is a good thing. The fact is the hobby has decided not all flaws are created equal and these standards have been established over a long period of time.

ullmandds · #3 02-16-2017, 07:39 AM

Whether we all agree on this board that a "paradigm shift" is "necessary" in the tpg world...not saying we do...but even if we did. It AINT GONNA HAPPEN!!!!!

As Aerosmith sang...DREAM ON!

JustinD · #4 02-16-2017, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glynparson

Is not nor should it be the same as eye appeal. People need to grasp this concept. And indeed buy the card not the holder. This leads to prices not being based solely on the number on the holder which to me is a good thing. The fact is the hobby has decided not all flaws are created equal and these standards have been established over a long period of time.

+1

Personally this is a non issue as we are comparing to a 1. A 1 is unequivocally the most vast category in existence. As long as it's a real card and 90% there it will get a 1, it basically means it's real and unaltered.

If this was a comparison between a 1.5 and 2 it could be a more salient topic for discussion.

Pat R · #5 02-16-2017, 12:07 PM

This Pastorius was previously in a PSA 2 holder. There is no paper loss but there is a paper pull on the back.
Pasorius%20hindu.jpg Pastorius%20Back b.jpg
Pastorius%20Back.jpg

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
OT: Consistent Team Batting Averages	oldjudge	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	7	09-26-2015 08:03 PM
Consistent grading	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	10	09-25-2008 06:09 PM
Goodwin Auction T216 Honus Wagner - consistent grading???	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	6	09-22-2006 11:58 AM
PSA vs. SGC - consistent and accurate?	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	45	02-09-2006 08:14 AM