 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-08-2017, 03:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
A little distilled water should get that right out JC, according to some of our members. Or if it takes some bleach but a good conservator/card doctor can mask it, well what the hell as long as a TPG blesses it I'm good.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 02-08-2017 at 03:49 PM. 
|
|
#2
02-08-2017, 04:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
As one of Ty Cobb's extremely rare rookies, I believe it has tremendous upside and virtually no down-side in any grade! If the timing was right, I would have bought it to keep my 1907 Dietsche Fielding Pose and 1907 Wolverine News Portrait Cobb rookies company with no second thoughts. The worst condition 1914 Baltimore News Ruth went from about $150,000 to $450,000 in 2-3 years, and the last word I heard on it was that the new owner wanted $694,000. Rare and significant in the best condition you can find or afford works in virtually any collectibles field over the long run!
Just my 25 cents worth, Larry Last edited by ls7plus; 02-08-2017 at 04:29 PM.
|
|
#3
02-08-2017, 04:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Which approach has served the hobby better? Allowing it to degrade? Or doing some conservation? Either approach can be considered valid. One preserves the card for longer than the other. The other keeps it "original". What if TPG found a way to accommodate conservation so that it was mentioned? I get that any conservation work would change the grade under todays standards. And that a higher number = more money. And that doing that work and getting that money without disclosure is leaning heavily towards the dishonest side of things. And I don't think that's the way to do things either. But I also don't think that having ongoing damage stabilized is a horrible thing. I view most other alterations the way most of us probably do. Trimming, crease removal, rebuilding corners, all things that really shouldn't be done, or if done shouldn't be given a grade as an original card would be. (although for some stuff they're accepted as long as there's disclosure) Steve B
|
|
#4
02-08-2017, 05:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I understand what you are saying, that there could be instances where conservation is a good thing, not because it improves appearance but because it preserves the card. Fine. I doubt that's why the DiMaggio was worked, but either way, my point remains that the work and any resulting change in grade should be disclosed so the buyer can make a decision based on all the facts. When a seller doesn't disclose it, the obvious intent is to deceive, in my opinion.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 02-08-2017 at 05:10 PM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Photobucket problems fixed | buymycards | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-15-2012 04:35 PM |
| VCP Problems..Fixed My Fault | Piratedogcardshows | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-26-2012 04:43 AM |
| Site Fixed Julie | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-27-2005 08:05 PM |
| Does Baseball Need to be Fixed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-16-2003 08:26 PM |
| LEW LIPSET AUCTION FIXED!!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-29-2001 05:36 PM |
Hybrid Mode
