Why would anybody do this?

[pokerplyr80]

Originally Posted by Leon

Cutting the card up was stupid.

Agreed. I can understand using a cut signature from an index card or canceled check, something along those lines. But an original signed card should be more valuable and collectible than a modern insert card.

[bnorth]

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

Agreed. I can understand using a cut signature from an index card or canceled check, something along those lines. But an original signed card should be more valuable and collectible than a modern insert card.

I don't buy this type of stuff but like to watch the prices of new stuff. Usually the first couple of owners(flippers) sell it for more than you could have the original card. Then once the issue is over a year old and the new product comes out the price drops like a rock and the original card would be worth more.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

Agreed. I can understand using a cut signature from an index card or canceled check, something along those lines. But an original signed card should be more valuable and collectible than a modern insert card.

They should have encased the whole card. It would have been way better and I would even like it ....

[Fred]

These companies should consider having PSA or SGC encapsulating the object and then have the flip indicate all the other details such as Topps, UD, etc. If they're too cheap to do that then they should consider encapsulating the pieces on their own. It'd be better than destroying bits of history.

[swarmee]

Originally Posted by Leon

They should have encased the whole card. It would have been way better and I would even like it ....

Wouldn't have fit into a standard pack then: it was made in 2004 or something, right? I agree they should have done a redemption for the full card.
Nowadays they probably would since they sell one pack inside a larger box and could get away with it since it would fit in a modern 1-pack box.