Questions about 1960 Post Cereal "cards"

[pawpawdiv9]

Here is one that I had before I sold it:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/200985215188...649&rmvSB=true

[AustinMike]

I couldn't find Mathews, so I must not have it. Wishful thinking I guess. I have attached the Drysdale. It does have what appears to be glue residue on the back. (Interesting, the back is showing up bigger than the front. What kind of error card is that? )

[Bestdj777]

Mike, the Drysdale is clearly a fake as they never made a Drysdale with a larger back than front. Please feel free to send it my way as in less concerned with authenticity

[AustinMike]

Hey Chris, sure, will do buddy. In fact, I will personally deliver it to you. Just send me your address, times when you won't be home, and where you keep the hidden key to your house and where you keep your Mantle collection so I can be sure to leave it in the right place.

[brian1961]

Originally Posted by pawpawdiv9

Here is one that I had before I sold it:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/200985215188...649&rmvSB=true

I STRONGLY beg to differ with SGC's idea of a grade of " 10 POOR" for that radiant piece. Several common, distinct clues are present that I wrote about in chapter 2 of my book. I realize SGC prides itself on the severity of their grading, but "10 POOR" What would they grade one with severe tape marks, a jagged lousy cut, writing on it, larger pin holes, and glue residue? There's too many fine qualities on your regal Mantle to have been stabbed mercilessly with a "10 POOR".

Then again, back in 2008, when SGC graded mine, which was missing perhaps a 1/64" stretch of the lovely frame, the graders gave it "AUTHENTIC". That was ok, I guess, considering I was the first collector who had ever submitted a 1960 Post Cereal to them, and they weren't sure it would fit into their largest holder. I was just relieved they were willing to give it a try, on my dime of course. As you can attest, they must shoe horn the card into their beautiful holder, and delicately cut own what's left of their black framing cardboard. It JUST fits, but the result is spectacular.

I put mine right smack dab in the middle of the cover of my book, NEVER CHEAPER BY THE DOZEN. Stands out just as Anita Ekberg!

1/2/2017 UPDATE: My 1960 Post Cereal Mantle has no glue or wax residue on the backside.

Anyway, thanks for sharing. ---Brian Powell

[pawpawdiv9]

@Brian: Since these were hand-cut from cereal boxes...They should be given 'AUTH" only for that reason. But we do see items like Bazookas given grades.
At the time, as mentioned in the Ebay description, there were only 2 given numerical grades by SGC and only 1 by PSA.

[Exhibitman]

Mathews, two strips of glue on back.

[whiteymet]

Thanks for the input Adam!

Anyone else have any of the 1960 Post?

[Paffman17]

I have recently acquired 8/9 of these, just missing the Unitas. I've learned a lot from this thread and I am trying to decide if getting these graded is the way to go or not. Thanks

[swarmee]

Probably depends how they're cut. If they have full frames and would get number grades, then they'd very likely be worth grading. Nice score.