 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
11-16-2016, 04:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Yep; I'm betting the card is written on and somehow PSA didn't give it the MK designation. The lines on the sleeve look off, as well as the button flap down the chest.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
|
#2
11-16-2016, 04:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yep. Looks like original photos are "touched up" before press time and then printed. My question is why wouldn't LEAF use the "touched up" photo for the entire run. They sure look better. Here's 2 more where the "touch up" was used, but for the entire production.(I think.) Dom's glasses and McCosky's sideburns were definitely added to the original photos.
Last edited by leaflover; 11-16-2016 at 04:37 PM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1949 Leaf Kiner Variation? | Robextend | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 07-13-2015 04:00 PM |
| 1949 Leaf Rosar variation discovered | Bob Lemke | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 03-29-2014 08:54 PM |
| LTB 1948 Leaf FB - Variation/Hi #/Auto'd | OTWCards | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-19-2009 10:47 AM |
| 1949 Leaf Variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 02-08-2009 09:02 PM |
| 1948 Leaf #98 Hal Newhouser Pose Variation?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 09-29-2008 02:32 PM |
Hybrid Mode
