![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's for the reponses. Not trying to call attention to anything yet. I don't think there are deceptive practices going on and I don't feel cheated so this is more for my own knowledge and hopefully for others as well. But...
If, for example you won an early 60's "Ex 5" lot, would you expect obvious wrinkles, spider lines, and or wax on the face of the card(s)? Things not visible by scan but very obvious in hand. I would expect soft corners, off centering and some small dings overall. Just want to make sure I'm looking at things the right way. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
General Ruth question | Shoeless Moe | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 08-14-2016 06:16 PM |
General Card Grading Question | CowboysGuide | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-07-2010 06:15 AM |
General E-bay Auction Question | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 06-30-2008 12:18 AM |
General Photograph question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-05-2007 01:30 AM |
A quality Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-12-2004 11:09 PM |