![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It used to be a phase to catalog every tiny T206 misprint.
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't imagine it's just our hobby or just T206s.
The stamps I specialize in have lots of varieties. One I just got has been known since at least the early 1960's, and was proven to be a constant variety in 2006. It's not listed in the Scott specialized catalog for US stamps. (actually a group of 4 different officials with a specimen over print where the "c" is broken. One per sheet and a short print run, so only 100 of each sold. ) On the other hand. Scotts lists a double transfer on the 10cent Treasury dept. It's been listed in the catalog since 1935, but there's never been an article about it. And nobody has seen one, and unfortunately there's no record of where they got the information from to list it in the first place. (Oddly I have a couple that I think might be it, but need to find a second copy to prove it. should be a long hunt..... ![]() They also list or don't list plate varieties that should be on different printings, but the list them for one but not the others. Big fun that cataloging stuff! Steve B |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Leon, That's kind of my point about this card, it has been stated through
out the hobby that it takes a few examples of a variation in order for it to be cataloged but there is no record of a sale of this variation and the only scan/picture I have seen is the T206 museum example. I'm ok with them cataloging variations when there are multiple examples but I don't think they should put prices on them until there are a few sales to reflect an accurate value. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are multiple of them out there, and they have been sold via auction from what I recall.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
found any sales of this variation but there are multiple sales of all of the other variations with the exception of the Maddox that Sean mentioned. Also T206 Museum states that the one on their site is the only known example. img062.jpg |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't locate it, at least easily. It could have been on Ebay.
Here is at least proof there is more than 1. http://m.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=84408 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Even if there are more than one there was suspicion back in 2004 that they are faked by the same person that did the fake 'nodgrass'
http://net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=65239
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
All of the other plate issue variations both cataloged and the ones that haven't been cataloged show up on a regular bases with the exception of this Mitchell card. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like oddball stuff as much as the next guy but a speck on a printers plate, to make a variations, just doesn't do it for me. However, if it keeps other crazy collectors, such as myself, busy then it is a wonderful thing. I am sure some things I collect are crazy to others. More to the original question, I would hope things don't get cataloged without enough comparative sales and cards.
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB "Jemmy" Mitchell Old Judge | oldjudge | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 0 | 04-14-2016 08:37 PM |
1969-topps complete set, high grade,,"""SOLD"""" | mightyq | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-10-2014 01:28 PM |
Does anyone know or does the following individual post here? "A. Mitchell" | Sean1125 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-15-2013 08:31 AM |
Large amount of "e", "w", and "t" cards (and more) for sale/trade!! | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 12-19-2010 11:31 AM |
Mitchell Toront _ missing "O" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-31-2004 07:00 PM |