 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-19-2016, 04:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
AJ
I only see one image? nevermimnd see them both now
Last edited by glynparson; 10-19-2016 at 04:24 PM. 
|
|
#2
10-19-2016, 04:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please post back scans so everyone can make an informed decision.
My guess prior to scans is the right is 7 left is 3.5, I believe I see a crease running through Jack at the top which has been taken with certain scanner settings to make it appear extremely minor when in hand in proper lighting it would be more prevalent. Last edited by Sean1125; 10-19-2016 at 04:26 PM.
|
|
#3
10-19-2016, 04:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
im guessing
the one on the right with worse centering is the 7. Its always tough to grade scans though.
Last edited by glynparson; 10-19-2016 at 04:26 PM.
|
|
#4
10-19-2016, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
sorry these scans suck but more hints. Both cards have similar very light caramel staining on back and both have no creases
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #7 all-time.
|
|
#5
10-19-2016, 04:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ok I'll go with the bottom is a 3.5 and the top is a 7st
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼
|
|
#6
10-19-2016, 04:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
10-19-2016, 05:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
7 is the right, 3.5 the left. I detect a surface wrinkle.
|
|
#9
10-19-2016, 05:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd take the one on the right any day of the week. That diamond cut/slant kills the one on the left and makes it very hard to look at it. Not sure how that fact impacts the grading gods, though.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land  https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. 
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
