![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a little afternoon game for you.
Which one is the PSA 7 and PSA 3.5? Backs are both similar.
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 10-19-2016 at 03:22 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don"t see any images AJ
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I only see one image? nevermimnd see them both now
Last edited by glynparson; 10-19-2016 at 03:24 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please post back scans so everyone can make an informed decision.
My guess prior to scans is the right is 7 left is 3.5, I believe I see a crease running through Jack at the top which has been taken with certain scanner settings to make it appear extremely minor when in hand in proper lighting it would be more prevalent. Last edited by Sean1125; 10-19-2016 at 03:26 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
the one on the right with worse centering is the 7. Its always tough to grade scans though.
Last edited by glynparson; 10-19-2016 at 03:26 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sorry these scans suck but more hints. Both cards have similar very light caramel staining on back and both have no creases
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok I'll go with the bottom is a 3.5 and the top is a 7st
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then I bow out. Scans are not high enough quality to render an accurate opine.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I think the centering on the first one(left) is superior to the second one (right), though it (left) has more staining. I'm guessing better centering is of more importance than staining, when the staining is slight. WARNING: English Lesson follows: By the way, the backs of the two cards can be similar, however 'similar' is an inclusive adjective. Hence, 'both' is implied. So saying 'both' are similar is not necessary. After all, one, by itself, cannot be similar, nor can the other - separately. .
__________________
. "A life is not important except in the impact it has on others lives" - Jackie Robinson “If you have a chance to make life better for others and fail to do so, you are wasting your time on this earth.”- Roberto Clemente |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
From what I have seen from PSA, either one could be the 7?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Left is 3.5, right is 7 but most of us clearly know that the 7 is not REALLY a 7...........cmon!!!!!
![]() Peace, Mike |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe PSA, doesn"t know either?Seen some of there grades,I thought were to high & some of there grades, thought was way to low!Got a 1964 Duke Snider with green magic marker on front of the card,{auction card}I had won,they said was a {5} ex?Not in my or any ones other book,would that be a ex card!
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Neither looks bad enough for a 3.5, or nice enough for a 7 from what I can see in the scans. If forced to choose based on those two scans alone I would pick the one on the bottom.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The trimmed one is the 7.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for playing along. The 3.5 was just graded and is mine. Grading inconsistency is real folks. :-) Reason for the 3.5 given was "back staining"
(I'll throw in a 5 for good measure)
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 10-19-2016 at 09:45 PM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A consistency in inconsistency.
Forget the grade. Your 3.5 CJ Joe is a beautiful card! |
![]() |
|
|