![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I took some time and looked at about half of my Polar Bears. Sorry to say that I have no matches on the cards posted so far in this thread.
Here are a few things I did see on the backs of the cards I checked out. These 3 cards had plate scratches on the backs. O'Leary (hok), Lajoie and Ritter. Purtell & Jack White have vertical lines in almost the same spots as the 4 other cards I listed in my earlier post. Doc White has a ink splotch in the "e" of Bear along with a crop line (+) in the upper right corner. My Pelty, Sweeney, Conroy and Slagle were different than the cards you posted, meaning the print was clean or they didn't have a plate scratch on them. My Meyers card was different in the fact that the "s" in the second "always" had a ink splotch dividing the letter. When I get some time in the next few days I will take a look at the rest of my Polar Bears and post up anything that may help. Jantz |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I went through my scans because I thought I remembered seeing defects similar to the ones you describe on your Doc White and Meyers. I didn't find any but I did discover a Cobb (Red Port) that matched one of the Camnitz (H.A.H,)/Mullin (With Bat ) pairs. Cobb-Camnitz.jpg |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Pat,
I checked my Cobb (red) & both Camnitz (hah) that I have and neither had the print defect as those you've posted. No Mullin in my possession yet, so nothing to compare it to. The fact that you found a Camnitz that matches is impressive. He is a tougher player to find with a Polar Bear back. I do know that he held multiple positions on a sheet since one of my Camnitzs is a two-namer. Took some time tonight and looked thru a few more of my Polar Bears and have noted these defects on them. I also wanted to get the names in this thread as a reference for you & Chris. Here is a list of my cards with notable defects. Marquard is clean with no defects like those you posted. Howell (hah) - The letter "s" in best is broken up by an ink splotch. Griffith (batting) - The letter "l" in Polar is broken up by an ink splotch. Nichols (batting) - The letter "P" in Polar is broken up by a ink splotch. Perring - Has a plate scratch running the width of the card thru the word Bear. O'Neil - Has a vertical line much like those on the Scott & others I've mentioned. Davis (Davis on front) - Ink splotch very similar to the second Marquard you posted. Also notice the "s" in best. Scan below. As always, Pat & Chris, please feel free to contact me if you need any help or want me to check any of my Polar Bears. Jantz |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jantz,
Here's another Davis like yours. Davis copy.jpg and here's a McGraw (Port) that matches. McGraw - Copy.jpg And a Griffith (Batting) like the one you describe that also has part of the "P" blocked/missing in scrap. Griffith 2 - Copy.jpg Last edited by Pat R; 10-19-2016 at 11:22 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My Griffith is a match. Now to find the other two players.
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It must be a combination of to many scans and not keeping track of them
better. I had put the Griffith with McQuillan and Hummel but I didn't update it here when I did. McQuillan - Hummel - Griffith.jpg |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: B. Milligan SGC 20 (polar bear) | Joshwesley | T206 cards B/S/T | 4 | 06-24-2016 06:30 AM |
WTB: Cubs with Polar Bear backs/Any Polar Bear backs | wazoo | T206 cards B/S/T | 6 | 09-16-2014 07:55 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Polar Bear Tin | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-05-2004 10:30 AM |