![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you all for your thoughts, comments, and questions. I have been closely watching your reactions to our original post and I’m replying now to answer the questions that were raised. This will be our last post on this thread. If you have further questions, or have feedback you’d like to share, please send an email directly to me (betsy@pwccauctions.com) or to our bid monitoring email address (bidmonitoring@pwccauctions.com).
Questions concerning our ability to enforce our Bid Retraction Policy Retractions on PWCC items: Just like other sellers on eBay, we are notified real-time when a bid is retracted on our auctions. We review the issue and take action daily.
For each occurrence of a bid retraction, as well as through various spot checks of our listings, we take note of the total number of bid retractions that a particular user ID has on their account eBay-wide. We take action based on the following approach:
We are starting with 25 as the threshold to help get the word out. Starting in Q1 2017 it will be reduced to 10, and later in 2017 it may be reduced to 5. Questions about the definition of String Bidding: As highlighted by many of you, simply placing a series of sequential bids is not string bidding. We understand the logistics of bidding on eBay, particularly using eBay’s app which actually makes it easiest to place minimum bids, and we understand that many bidders place a series of sequential bids for completely legitimate reasons. Here’s why placing a series of bids at the minimum bid increment can be problematic: Let's assume there are two bidders interested in a listing. Bidder A is the high bidder at $6,000, but has a maximum bid of $7350. Bidder B places a bid of $6,100, and eBay raises the bid to $6,200. Bidder B bids $6,300 and eBay raises the bid to $6,400, and so on. Finally, when Bidder B bids $7,300, eBay raises the bid to $7,350 (not $7,400) thereby ‘outing’ bidder A’s max bid. This essentially allowed Bidder B to increase the bidding to Bidder A’s max bid while greatly reducing the likelihood that they became the high bidder themselves (50/50 odds). We will remain patient on this topic as it’s NOT our primary concern (bid retractions and unpaid items are far larger issues), but we do hope to limit string bidding and will contact users who seem to employ this behavior. Two important notes: 1. Most troubling is when there is an instance of string bidding paired with a bid retraction. A bidder that engages in this behavior has and will be blocked from participating in PWCC auctions and will be reported to eBay. We have a zero tolerance on obviously manipulative behavior and string bidding paired with a retraction is considered highly manipulative. 2. String bidding which ultimately results in that user ID becoming the high bidder (eventually) will not be flagged by PWCC as this clearly suggests that the string bidder has real intention to win the item. Since implementing our policies here are some statistics:
Last edited by Brent Huigens; 10-16-2016 at 11:32 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
psa pwcc..hi bidder.r u kidding me? | sflayank | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 09-04-2016 03:42 PM |
eBay buyer wants money back--policy? | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-31-2015 05:38 AM |
A Question concerning Ebay's Buyer Protection Policy -- seeking some advice :) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-06-2013 05:40 PM |
New eBay Bidder Policy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 01-16-2007 06:58 PM |
Question about Ebay's Non-Paying Bidder Policy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-06-2003 06:17 PM |