![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think there is a vast difference between historically important items, which will hold value or increase, and other collectible items, especially those based upon condition alone. Obviously the best is to have an histoically important, rare item in great condition. However, I would much rather have an historically important item in poor condition, than nearly all mint modern cards. When cards that are fairly common, but in a high grade, start selling for more than rarer historically important items, I think this is a bad sign. Having said that, I have tried to never substitute my judgment for that of another collector. I also acknowledge that what is historically important is very subjective. For me, my historical collection is 19th century baseball, while I enjoy my Ashburn collection, knowing it is unlikely to appreciate to any great extent.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Negro League memorabilia collector(s) in the market? | bcbgcbrcb | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 03-05-2018 02:15 PM |
What's your take on PSA's Sports Market Report? | daves_resale_shop | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 04-30-2014 04:09 PM |
Wanted: Flea market stock vintage cards memorabilia | GrayGhost | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-08-2012 08:33 AM |
PSA Sports Market Report | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-08-2008 08:01 PM |
FS: Sports Market Report | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 08-30-2007 07:04 PM |