![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I decided to pull this out of the other thread, and see if we can get some opinions. Most people decided #2 was the Mantle they would choose. Now let see what you think the final hammer price these will end at at auction. Number 3 shown already sold in REA's Spring auction for $180K.
#1 ![]() ![]() #2 AND #3 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If the colors are true I would agree, #2 is the best looking card.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Mantle #1 sold in April 2016 for $294K according to VCP. Any guesses of what it will sell for this time? Is the latest price run-up over, or will this card continue to go up? How about the Mantle #2? Will it surpass the PSA graded copy?
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I see the point you're trying to make but doubt the auction results will reflect the board's opinion. 330k for the PSA, 210k for the SGC.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You may be right. I figure this card is so out of the league for most of us, that we really have no concept of what it should sell for. That's why I gave recently realized prices, but it's probably hard for most of us to know which way the market is really going for the high-end material.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You may be right. And it is stupid. Number 2 (if colors sre true as another person mentioned) BLOWS AWAY number 1. In fact, i like both sgc cards much better than the psa. Guys buying holders instead of cards really bothers me.
Last edited by orly57; 10-01-2016 at 10:11 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
People are selling 'independent' opinions....if there was no holder every seller would be saying their card is 'mint' would be so many returns..
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, the PSA Mantle finished at $306,250 in the Goldin Auction. I wonder how the SGC will fair? Nearly everyone seemed to pick it over the PSA example, but I wonder if it will be able to top $306K?
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My money says no. PSA, although I hate to admit it, seems to always, (based on what I have seen) come out on top price wise.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 Last edited by irv; 10-04-2016 at 05:54 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Goldin sold #2 two months ago for 180k. Now Goodwin is selling it.and it is at 170k with 2 days left.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Right. But two months ago may be like an eternity in "Mantle Land". What will it bring this time? I'm going to guess less than the PSA example. I'll guess it ends at $227K.
Last edited by GasHouseGang; 10-05-2016 at 09:53 AM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It sells for 169k, the flipper loses money. Also PSA 8 Clemente RC for 42k. If this was a flipper, it would also be a loss.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wonder if the new owner will try to cross it to PSA and flip it again? Did that card really finish at $137K less than the PSA example? Ouch!
Last edited by GasHouseGang; 10-07-2016 at 09:53 AM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() I don't have the auction links nor any prior info, but did both SGC cards lose money compared to previous sales?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The one sold in the latest Goodwin auction was a loss. The consignor lost 224.00 + shipping plus whatever Goodwin made (20%?).
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks, Rats60. Guess it could have been a lot worse, but I believe that is the first time I have heard about someone losing money on a 52 Mantle.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Don't assume the card "sold" the first time around.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
True. I learned that with the $80,000 Koufax and the $150,000 Rose.
Still don't know how it all works or what is all involved with this, but it definitely creates confusion. ![]()
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Right after the auction they always say 'sold' or something to the effect of the final sales price even though never got payment yet....i would think it would not look good to an AH to announce that a winning bidder on a 200k card did not pay because in future auctions people may not be willing to offer highest dollar when there are some bidders that are competing with dont actually pay..
Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 10-07-2016 at 07:13 PM. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I would also assume, after some time has passed, that the A/H corrects the sold price to that of what the underbidder bid? Just thinking? What would happen, with the unbidder thinking he didn't win, all of a sudden being told he told? Is he now obligated to purchase the card? What if he spent his money elsewhere before he found out? What happens in that case?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I know some auction houses list names of people who didnt pay though, i guess theres a court option as well but probably rarely used. Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 10-08-2016 at 04:03 PM. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
As far as the underbidder goes, that happened to me with an E-Bay purchase. I was outbid only to be told later the top bidder retracted his bid and now I was the top bidder. I seen no place where it was an option if I still wanted the card, only that I was the top bidder and if I no longer wanted it, (had moved on etc), my only option was to retract my own bid. ![]() I purchased it as I did still want it but I always wondered about that if I no longer did?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 Last edited by irv; 10-08-2016 at 05:30 PM. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Is it a recorded mark/flag against you if you had moved on/spent your money elsewhere when you were originally outbid?
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T210 Joe Jackson Hammer Price | kcohen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 09-09-2016 11:12 PM |
Let's play a game: guess the hammer price order of PWCC Rose RC PSA 6 | rsdill2 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 02-09-2015 09:58 AM |
Brooklyn Atlantics cdv hammer price contest + prize | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 44 | 02-06-2013 04:29 PM |
Anybody surprised by this hammer price? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-12-2007 07:30 AM |
Can someone explain the hammer price on this T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 01-17-2007 07:06 AM |