Early Jeter auto opinions needed

[JoeyFarino]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

One thing I never understood, and I see it done increasingly frequently lately.
If you know you have no expertise on a subject, why offer your admittedly not-very-valuable opinion? I'm sure there are loads of not-very-knowledgable-about-Jeter-signatures folks the OP could have asked. But he posted here in order to tap in to those who know best.

Very true. After i gave my opinion i realized it wasnt the smartest comment. Hope the OP gets some knowledgeable advice

[chaddurbin]

chris would be the authority on jeter obviously. i've asked him about lots of jeters and trying to learn myself but i've never quite seen this style. looks like it could be his transition sig between the '92 classic and '94 signature rookies...it has characteristics of both.

never seen this type of sig, but i like alot about it, so i'd buy it if the price is right. just my opinion tho.

[HOFAUTOS]

100% good, and beautiful!

[MGHPro]

Thanks everyone - I appreciate it
Matt

[Mr. Zipper]

Hate to be a party pooper, but I have concerns about this Jeter. I wouldn't touch it for my collection.

Very stiff, drawn look. Sinking baseline... the whole thing looks cockeyed.

[thetruthisoutthere]

+1

From the moment I looked at it I didn't like it.

[MGHPro]

Thanks guys . Appreciate it.