Early Jeter auto opinions needed

[Wrightfan85]

Not an expert but my first instinct is fake. Almost looks like someone tried to combine his auto now with his auto from the 1992 Little Sun card set.

[JoeyFarino]

Looks ok but not a expert

[David Atkatz]

One thing I never understood, and I see it done increasingly frequently lately.
If you know you have no expertise on a subject, why offer your admittedly not-very-valuable opinion? I'm sure there are loads of not-very-knowledgable-about-Jeter-signatures folks the OP could have asked. But he posted here in order to tap in to those who know best.

[MGHPro]

Thanks

[yanksfan09]

Looks good to me, likely circa 1994-95 would be my guess.

[JoeyFarino]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

One thing I never understood, and I see it done increasingly frequently lately.
If you know you have no expertise on a subject, why offer your admittedly not-very-valuable opinion? I'm sure there are loads of not-very-knowledgable-about-Jeter-signatures folks the OP could have asked. But he posted here in order to tap in to those who know best.

Very true. After i gave my opinion i realized it wasnt the smartest comment. Hope the OP gets some knowledgeable advice

[chaddurbin]

chris would be the authority on jeter obviously. i've asked him about lots of jeters and trying to learn myself but i've never quite seen this style. looks like it could be his transition sig between the '92 classic and '94 signature rookies...it has characteristics of both.

never seen this type of sig, but i like alot about it, so i'd buy it if the price is right. just my opinion tho.

[HOFAUTOS]

100% good, and beautiful!

[MGHPro]

Thanks everyone - I appreciate it
Matt

[packs]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

One thing I never understood, and I see it done increasingly frequently lately.
If you know you have no expertise on a subject, why offer your admittedly not-very-valuable opinion? I'm sure there are loads of not-very-knowledgable-about-Jeter-signatures folks the OP could have asked. But he posted here in order to tap in to those who know best.

Some people are very familiar with signatures but don't want some guy going off their sole opinion, so they say they aren't an expert but. I don't see the problem with that. If I saw a Mattingly signature I'm pretty sure I could tell you if it was real or not but I don't want you betting the farm on me. Same goes for a variety of people with a variety of signatures. Anyone willing to help should be thanked.

[David Atkatz]

Even when the help is--by the author's own admission--worthless?

There have been loads of times I could have posted "I don't know jack-shit about this, but I think it's bad. You're welcome."

[MGHPro]

I agree.. ANY opinion is welcome . I'm pretty good with modern jeter autos, but this one was tough for me to decide on.. some parts I liked and some I did not.