![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My belief is that Topps cards usually command higher prices simply because the OPC cards are not as popular with most set collectors. If you take a quick look at the PSA Registry for OPC complete sets being worked and compare it to the Topps counterpart you will see more than 20 times the number of collectors are working on Topps sets versus OPC. I believe it's just as simple as not as many collectors are chasing OPC cards to complete sets. I believe the same is true for collectors working on raw sets also, but those people doing raw sets aren't usually paying top dollar anyways.
With that said, I personally believe that OPC cards should be valued more than their Topps counterpart and I am one of the ones that will pay more for a high grade OPC card. Donato
__________________
Nolan Ryan Master Set: http://www.psacard.com/PSASetRegistr...x?s=12080&ac=1 Nolan Ryan Topps Master Set: http://www.psacard.com/PSASetRegistr...?s=192675&ac=1 Last edited by divecchia; 09-16-2016 at 07:26 PM. Reason: spelling |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would think that collectors would be more interested in scarcity myself,but I also understand the "Nostalgia" that comes with collecting cards. I myself like to buy both issues of a certain player of interest at that time.
With all the interest the hobby is starting to gain again and with the boom in the vintage card market going crazy you would think that those OPC cards would pick up steam now more than ever,but I find that even at most shows alot of dealers don't carry them. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's because they are foreign. Other foreign issues-- Canadian Goudey, etc--, also don't have value that reflect their relative rarity.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Based on the prices paid in the past for a 71 OPC complete set, there is seemingly some strong demand:
http://apr15.hugginsandscott.com/cgi...l?itemid=83093 I am S-L-O-W-L-Y working my way through the OPC sets from 65-84.....doing well on all except the 74s. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
have maybe 350 OPC, 1965-1971, of which 250-275ish are '71s.
always liked the look of the '71 backs, so much that way back when I stored most of my cards in pages the back - not the front - was displayed. here's a few of the better ones: DS |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1969 Topps SP Question | johnmh71 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 11 | 11-15-2012 05:00 AM |
Another Topps trivia question | cardinalcollector | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 11-13-2012 07:19 PM |
53 Topps Pee Wee Reese question. | GrayGhost | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 05-24-2012 09:19 PM |
1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 07:51 PM |
question on 70's topps | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 3 | 10-12-2007 11:27 AM |