What the heck!! Im baffled!

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Originally Posted by vintagesportscollector

What's interesting is two different hands, but the same unique simple method of scoring. There are also scoring difference between the two. I think the first was just scored incorrectly, and the second tried to copy the first. Did you get these from the same source?

No, thats the thing... I picked these up from 2 totally different people. One not even being a collector.

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Originally Posted by EYECOLLECTVINTAGE

No, thats the thing... I picked these up from 2 totally different people. One not even being a collector.

Looks like Bankhead is one and Radford is another on the SP?

[vintagesportscollector]

A lot of differences. Look closer. Looks like the second tried to copy the first and couldn't read the handwriting.

17v3onz6.jpg

nokugjtz.jpg

[vintagesportscollector]

who knows what happened. I wouldn't get too dazed and confused over it. Perhaps at one point these were scored together by two brothers, one trying to copy the other. Perhaps someone tried to fake the second one. Seems like a big coincidence they would both be reunited with you.., but, who knows...

[EYECOLLECTVINTAGE]

Originally Posted by vintagesportscollector

who knows what happened. I wouldn't get too dazed and confused over it. Perhaps at one point these were scored together by two brothers, one trying to copy the other. Perhaps someone tried to fake the second one. Seems like a big coincidence they would both be reunited with you.., but, who knows...

I know! That's why I was so stumped. I remember opening the first one up and saying oh nice a HOME RUN! then after baseball reference proved otherwise I was bummed. Then I just noticed the 2nd one today and was like what the heck? Anyways, I need to unload one if anyone is interested PM me. Thanks for the input guys.

[Shoeless Moe]

maybe they took the home run away from him on review

[Huck]

From perusing the box score. Robinson had 5 plate appearances. He totaled 3 at bats. He was walked twice (once intentionally). His at bats consisted of reaching base on an error (E6, top of the third), a double (top of the fourth) and some kind of an out (top of the eighth). Perhaps what looks like HR is actually ER.

[Huck]

As I look closer at the top card, the little squiggle on what is being seen as an R in HR, sure looks like a tiny 6 to me. There was an error on that play, E6. Perhaps, the spectator initially wrote H (single) and the official scorer ruled E6. I don't see many erasures on the page. I agree with the other poster, that the bottom card was copied.

[sbfinley]

Robinson reached on an error in the 3rd and then later scored.