![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Blank backs are generally considered junk. If you can find a error collector you can get a small premium. If you can find a player collector that also collects errors you can get a nice premium.
I have collected these type of cards for close to 30 years. I only collect raw so not sure how much difference the Beckett or any other slab makes. Also Topps printing errors are far from rare. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Cool card!
__________________
Neal Successful transactions with Brian Dwyer, Peter Spaeth, raulus, ghostmarcelle, Howard Chasser, jewishcollector, Phil Garry, Don Hontz, JStottlemire, maj78, bcbgcbrcb, secondhandwatches, esehobmbre, Leon, Jetsfan, Brian Van Horn, MGHPro, DeanH, canofcorn, Zigger Zagger, conor912, RayBShotz, Jay Wolt, AConte, Halbig Vintage and many others https://www.youtube.com/@Coach_Neal |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice card Mike!
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's a '72 Topps card so it's a very cool looking card format, one of the best in my view, it's Rose and it's in pristine condition so to me it has value. What the value is, I'm unsure, but there are Rose collectors, and a fairly large group of die hard Cincinnati Reds collectors so it should be desirable to one of these groups of people.
I think blank backs are generally less valuable than finished cards. I'm sure it depends on the card, but that's been my experience. Also, I guess you can consider an unfinished card a proof card and in this case a blank back. Who really knows whether Topps used it as a proof. My guess... $100 ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the feedback so far.
M |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Blank backs and proofs are kind of a funny thing. To a lot of collectors they're not very desirable. But to the right player collector, they could be worth quite a bit. In that condition, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see a die hard Rose collector drop a couple hundred on it.
__________________
Actively collecting Carl Yastrzemski ! Also 1964 & 68 Topps Venezuelans |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I collect error cards and have purchased similar blank backs of HOFers for under $200 so my guesstimate is between $100-$200.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Nice card either way. Z |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone Have 1972 Topps Pete Rose(s) to Trade? | JollyElm | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-18-2016 06:41 PM |
For Sale ** Sold ** : 1972 Topps Rose ( Blank Back Proof ) SGC Authentic | svtPONY95 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 11-06-2013 08:27 AM |
WTB Pete Rose Topps from 1972 to 1982 | 25801wv | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 11-25-2012 11:25 AM |
1968 topps gaylord perry blank back nr mt,leaf pete rose auto mint ends 9/5 ten om | rjackson44 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 4 | 09-05-2012 04:27 PM |
1972 topps pete rose decent card$50 book value ends 1/3 ten pm | rjackson44 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 5 | 01-03-2012 10:04 AM |