![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
As for the card, it absolutely could be a mark drawn on there. I will continue checking it...
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 08-20-2016 at 08:13 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks drawn on to me, but pretty tough to be a 100% without the card in hand.
Not a pencil mark, imo, but rather a black pencil. Have you tried one of your erasers on it? ![]()
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes, I just tried the eraser and it didn't erase it. The more I look at it the more I think it's ink from the mfg process. It has the same sheen and look, when held closely to look at, as the other black area. Still not positive though. There is a Beckett Raw Card Review this coming weekend, at the Dallas Card Show show, and one of the best graders in the hobby is doing it so I will check and see what they say this coming weekend.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let us know Leon. If it is part of the manufacturing process the next question is whether it is recurring and if so how scarce. Recurring back defects are hard to run down since there are so few back scans on eBay. COMC and Deans cards are where I try to run down back variants.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm pretty sure someone spilled blank ink on the card (maybe with water too). Look at the missing "n" in brown. Unless my eyes are deceiving me - you can even spot the edges of the entire blob of ink on the card.
Pretty sure you won't get to retire on this card Leon! Cheers, Patrick |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If they can add a 61 Ron Fairly with an errant green smudge in the baseball on the back to the Registry, they can add anything they want
![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It has been checked by a senior grader at Beckett and he says there is no doubt whatsoever it is from the mfg process and contemporary to the card being made. He said he didn't remember that error occurring on others but of course he wasn't sure of it. He just didn't remember seeing any like it. I knew it looked like the exact same ink because it is.
![]() And Steve B in post 6, you might be right!! Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 09-13-2016 at 06:13 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It will soar from a $4 card all the way to a $5 card!! And I agree it's kind of cool ....
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 09-13-2016 at 07:17 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1952 topps gray back pricing | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 11-20-2015 08:05 PM |
Looking for personal collection: Wrong back, Misprint, Oddities | Sean1125 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 8 | 09-03-2015 02:53 PM |
FS: E92 Croft's Murphy Back Error Misprint Freak - SGC 30 - Unique? | robw1959 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 08-30-2015 04:51 PM |
FS/FT Justin Upton 2012 Topps Tribute Superstar Swatches Gold 07/15 | cardsfan73 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 4 | 07-19-2014 10:30 PM |
Any 1952 Topps grey back traders? | SMPEP | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 06-14-2012 05:17 PM |