![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If it's the exact same card? I'd rather have the label without the qualifier. With that said, I do own one 9OC:
![]()
__________________
Actively collecting Carl Yastrzemski ! Also 1964 & 68 Topps Venezuelans |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'll take the PSA 9OC, assuming the eye appeal is decent.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i'd take those too Bob
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
I collect vintage hof's my bucket http://s765.photobucket.com/albums/x...ntlecollector/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It a preference thing for sure, and non-qualifier cards are more marketable, but I agree with someone else who said I like "pack-fresh", so I would take the OC's every time. I have a different view of MC's, because that to me changes the eye appeal of the card.
If you've got some great OC stars for sale - send them my way! |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If it's the same card I would rather have a 9 OC than an off center card in a straight 7 holder. Although unless it was a big card thats hard to find, like that yellow Gehrig, I probably wouldn't seek out either unless the deal was too good to pass up.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
![]() |
|
|