![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A new or revamped grading service will emerge that concentrates on high end, high priced cards only with more detailed grading and better security features.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Not all graded cards need to be treated equally. Pay extra for the very high Enders |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A new grading company could emerge secondarily to getting a high amount of traffic/customers on their site.
One example is one of those companies that gives historical pricing. If they later went into the card grading business that would be an entryway. Another example could be an owner registry site. This would be a site where everyone could register thier 1952 Mantles no matter the grading company and people can confirm a new purchase isnt a duplicate. Another example can be a super registry site. This site would be a much cooler registry site and also factor in grades from other grading companys to have the 'best set ever' and not just with PSA.. Basically a grading company cant come out of nowhere. I know the normal come out of nowhere process would be former respected graders from PSA etc, but i think it would take an already popular business that people respected and then respected graders etc.. Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 08-14-2016 at 07:20 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Would anyone give credence to a registry site that permitted other TPG grades? What graders would those registry sets accept? PSA, SGC, BVG/BGS, KSA?, ISA? PRO?, all of them?
I can see the SGC and maybe Beckett people getting behind a better registry site, but the PSA people will thumb their nose at sheet cut Gretzky rookies and short BGS Jeter rookies, and not go through all the work to import their cards to another competitor site. People are loyal to their grading company of choice like smokers are to their brand. PSA is still Marlboro. Or Microsoft. Or Coca Cola. They are the vast majority of the market, and once a company gets to that position, it is rare to give it up.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 08-14-2016 at 08:08 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Nothing else will make a dent, IMO. Maybe Beckett buys out SGC, and loads their black gaskets into the BVG holders? And takes over SGC's lousy website and integrates it with Becketts? Hearing the reports at the National of PSA grading being slammed all week and the SGC employees either "twiddling their thumbs" or "looking like sad puppies" make me think the battle has already been lost.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe that there is room for a new company to come out of nowhere and bring a computer based grading service to the table. I know this has been discussed before, but with all the talk of inconsistency, 'eye appeal' and changing standards, I could see a 'software weenie' developing some code that would put today's graders to shame. There are so many optical recognition codes out there now including facial recognition - Facebook can tell me who's in a photo before I can tag it, it seems like it would be low-hanging fruit to optically measure borders, color, registration, corner wear, etc and give them numerical grades and then combine those grades into an overall grade that is more in line with what we call 'eye appeal'. And then also to bring some innovation into the registry.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-66) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Also while looking through dealers booths the number of PSA slabbed cards vs. SGC slabbed cards was also noticeable. For years people said Pre war to SGC and Topps/Bowman era to PSA but I have been seeing a trend of more Pre War era cards in PSA slabs with the set registry/ higher prices fueling this trend. My only complaint with PSA is their turnaround times with bulk submissions taking up to 3 months to grade but a recent thread over on their board looks like they are addressing this issue with a posting for jobs looking for graders at their Newport Beach location. Last edited by basesareempty; 08-15-2016 at 07:09 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: HOF RCs & Future HOF RCs | toadkc | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 1 | 07-18-2016 12:59 PM |
Future of card grading? | Vintagevault13 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 01-29-2014 05:04 PM |
The future has rejected TPA card grading | travrosty | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-28-2013 03:30 PM |
Future for Psa? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-23-2008 04:53 PM |
future of grading companies | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-22-2005 07:27 AM |